Github : Paying the price for hiring cunts



The case of Julie Anne Hovarth vs Github had all the the makings of a cookie cutter Adria Richard-Sendgrid event and its resemblance just increases with each update.

Not surprisingly, Julie, as most hypocrites do, has switched her tune from “sexism” to internal politics and now still wants more heads to roll despite the fact that her version of event is far removed from reality according to a recent post on medium detailing how she dated several people within the company, failed to barter sex for power/promotions then started to spread rumors of male co-workers having been cuckolded and their babies not being legitimate. See? She is completely innocent…

But this debacle got its crowning confirmation when one of Github co-founders Tom Preston-Werner  “had to resign” just the way the programmers at Pycon “had to fire themselves” for “unacceptable behavior” sure…that sounds politically correct enough. But without the obstacle of the lies of political correctness, the act of firing a co-founder just because of a cunt is more damaging to Github than to Tom Preston-Werner himself. Simply because men like Preston-Werner will ultimately go on and be more successful than Adria and Julie combined. In 30 years time what will Adria and Julie have done vs Tom? Tom most likely will be still active and Adria and Julie will be old fat and frustrated at their failures because nothing will have been their fault and because they were always “oppressed”.

The difference between a Social Justice Warrior and a true Entrepreneur is only one of them truly achieves and the other wants to be forever “empowered”. The problem with empowering people is that if they fail they can always say the empowerment was not enough but not their fault. Empowering an army of donkeys without a lion commanding them is just a lost battle. Congratulations Github keep empowering the social justice warriors donkeys!

Regrettably, “Empowerment” in the tech sector translates as

fire your high achievers to keep your PR happy. FYI, PR is more important than  technology



In 30 years time. Would you like to know how many githubs and sendgrids Adria and Julie will have started?

The answer is most likely ZERO.


Why? Because no one “empowered them” or because of the “tech patriarchy” or some other excuse.

Poor vulnerable princesses! The patriarchy causes them to be mediocre…Right?

Fucking cunts…






BTW here is the medium post just in case it is “casually” taken down




Every story has two sides and for several weeks now Julie Ann Horvath has decided to share only the details of her side of her experiences at GitHub and the circumstances around her departure.

A few of us, those who knew Julie and the events that occurred, have decided that if Julie wants to share this story so publicly then everyone should at least have all of the story.

Here are some details that may help explain this story a little differently.

The Engineer
Julie calls out an engineer in her story. The engineer she alleges harassed her was in fact an ex-boyfriend that she was still friends with at the time, not a random coworker she barely knew. They had dated prior to working at GitHub and were on good terms at the time.

The project he “ripped out” code from was a small css refactoring on an internal side project that he was helping her with. At the time of the incident, she was not upset about it and it was quickly fixed. At the time of her departure, she was not on great terms with him and her public story changed.

The Cofounder and His Wife
Around the end of 2012, Julie started dating a close male friend of the cofounder’s wife and didn’t like that they were close. She asked them to stop being friends and when they would not end their relationship, Julie started telling coworkers that the wife had affairs and that the cofounder’s newborn child was not his. She told this to multiple coworkers directly and also to the wife through her boyfriend.

This is where the wife reached out to her and the rest of her story starts. All of Julie’s story involving the cofounder’s wife occurs only after Julie was spreading vicious rumors about him to even new employees.

Three months later, the first Passion Projects talk was held at GitHub. It’s difficult to know if this was a concession by the cofounder for her to stop threatening his family and undermining him to his employees, or perhaps just a way for him to try to get on her good side so she would not want to hurt his family.

We share this because reading through the TechCrunch article with this in mind changes the story for us. It seems less like a story of gender issues and more like a story of the problems that arise when employees date coworkers and cannot separate work and personal life.

We dislike that she is taking advantage of people’s trust in her in order to craft a message for which she wants to be the symbol. Good people are suffering for a story she knows is not fully true and she does not seem to care.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: