Porn is War on Women, Part 2

DISCLAIMER 1: What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2: I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status. For those who stayed, behold;

(EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was featured at theralphretort.com)

TEACH THEM NOT TO THINK!

FEMINISTS HAVE MYSTERIOUS WAYS

As we saw in part one of this PORN IS WAR ON WOMEN series, feminists like Anita Sarkeesian have a rather dysfunctional relationship with porn because of their past sexual abuse. Problem is, feminists are a toxic Pandora’s box of contradictions. Somehow, they manage to jump from website to website only to land in the darkest crevices of the internet. Then just by “chance”, they end up watching the most fucked up porn available. After many accidental “discoveries” they find the sickest, hardest-core rape fantasy/rape-snuff video, THEN they lose their menses, stand up and yell…

BAN THIS GORY-MIDGET-CLOWN-RAPE PORN!  I MEAN! BAN ALL PORN!

Feminists actively fishing for porn that sexually offends them sounds like an anti-bacon radicalized Muslim. Hopping from restaurant to restaurant for days on end only to gorge on bacon, savoring its sinfully salty taste until he manages to find the one stale bacon strip, THEN he snaps and with mouth full of bacon he stands up & yells…

“ALLBAFF-MAAHU M-AK-FF-BA-MM-FR-GR-PTOI!”

Then he detonates his very Halal anti-bacon vest. Clarification: the proper suicidal expression is “ALLAHU-AKBAR” but the bacon bits coming from his mouth distorted the pronunciation. Apologies to all triggered stressed suicide bombers reading this.

More seriously, it does not make sense for feminists to oppose all forms of porn and to claim all of it is harmful and dysfunctional. Which begs the question: What kind of fucked up porn do they actually watch? Problem is, admitting to their fucked up porn watching habits would be in and of itself…”problematic”. But thankfully this feminist hypocrisy leads us to an even more interesting and filthier question…

How many kinds of porn are there?

Well, judging by the giant matrix of all smutty things (our dear porny internet) in my own rough estimates the surface web might contain around:

  • 70% of hetero porn (aka “vanilla porn”)
  • 25% would be lesbian porn marketed at hetero audiences (male gay porn, transporn and all other eccentric forms thrown in)
  • *5% which would be the illegal violent dysfunctional kind (child/rape/snuff and dysfunctional paraphilias mostly at deep/dark web level)

This last 5% would be a radfem favorite because it is the one to immediately blow out of proportion. That small 5% becomes 99% of all porn in order to fit their narratives. From the point of view of radical feminist demagogues, it is more convenient to claim that 99% of all online porn is “violent and dysfunctional” than the estimated 5%.

In essence, we have a loud, previously raped, sexually dysfunctional and anorgasmic minority of godawful-boil-in-the-ass-ugly radical lesbians trying to tell the world how and when to fuck. That makes as much sense as anorexic people telling the world what a “good” nutrition diet consists of. Feminism is a ghost restaurant for the sexually anorexic, good luck having a meal there.

*Note: My 5% estimate was based on the estimated  5% of actual serial rapists on campuses, but I will be glad to include more accurate estimates if you provide sources for them. BTW I found many infographs and stats on the kinds of porn available online but none of them elaborated upon how much “dysfunctional porn” is estimated to be available online. You can Google “porn infographic” then hunt down the references, however none seemed to include that category. Even worse, you’ll  find overblown estimates from hard-line Christian sites to discourage other Christians from watching porn.

VANILLA IN FLUX

flux_complete

Well first of all, Vanilla sex is NOT Vanilla porn as much as a new car is not a fucking transformer from a Michael Bay movie. Vanilla porn features sexual Olympians with above average bodies and sexual drives performing the most elaborate, acrobatic, and flamboyant sexual acts. Those then lead to some of the most the eccentric orgasms. Why the copious erotic flamboyance you may ask? Because porn follows the logic of dreams. Porn is very much like them: inspired by, but removed from reality.

The reason why Vanilla porn is so successful, is because Vanilla sex is quite mediocre. 

Vanilla porn is satisfaction and Vanilla sex is compliance. Many couples need to watch Vanilla porn to “enhance” their vanilla sexual compliance. It’s the same way a fat rhino on a treadmill would look at the poster of a pretty unicorn for inspiration. That is why Vanilla porn has brought Brazzers, BangBros or other similar well-known sites to the forefront of the internet. It is the affordable filthy ideal.

Obviously, the biggest sexual tragedy to human kind is having to have sex with a feminist. Why? Because most of them are godawfulboil-in-the-ass-ugly and/or anorgasmic thus they have a Nun-ish, prudish and deformed way of perceiving sex. Even harmless sex toys are rather “problematic” or only for “sexual deviants“, but the truth is far less elegant.

WOrPV7F

Leaving the feminist failures of human kind aside, what are the features of Vanilla porn? It mostly features vaginal, anal and oral penetration using one (or several) erect penises or their replacement, AKA sex toys. If the 3 forms of penetration take place at once, it is usually referred to as an “airtight” scene which is becoming more and more common. Alternatively, tongues and limbs can be used for anal and vaginal penetration but mostly what is used is much smaller, thinner limbs belonging to lesbian performers.  The use of mouths and tongues as improvised sexual organs or suction devices is also common, but mostly they are used for stimulation of orifices or genitals. Saliva, vaginal secretions and sperm are common and eccentrically used. Blood, nasal secretions, vomit, and excrement are (thankfully) absent in Vanilla porn.

See the contradiction? 60 years ago, nearly all of the acts above would have been considered “Toxic and Sinful“. 30 years ago? “Hard-Core”. But nowadays? Just Vanilla.

Here’s one thing that many people do not notice. There are two things Japan is almost always 10-20 years ahead of the west in: technology and experimental porn.

Therefore, today’s Japanese experimental hard-core porn is our future Vanilla Porn.

Fortunately, licking the cornea of a partner went out of fashion in Japan. Unfortunately, enemas containing living eels seems to be gaining momentum and might be in our own Western porn roadmap. And yes, I watched copious amounts of Japanese porn for science.

What is truly fascinating is how online Vanilla porn resembles another (seemingly) unrelated and distant industry that also offers massive, always available, nearly instantaneous satisfaction to a different set of physiological needs: The Fast Food Industry.

 

SWEET SWEET JUNK FOOD FOR THE GENITALS

TgAvkIQ (1) 

The human animal is a complex and paradoxical one, if the average person in the west has physiological needs, the satisfaction is immediate. Roughly like this:

  • Food? -> Junk Food/Fridge
  • A drink? -> Fridge
  • Urinate/defecate? -> Bathroom
  • Fuck? ->  Internet…

The last one is paradoxical, because instead of “Internet” it should be sexual worker or sexual partner. But given the aforementioned limited choice, high cost, and chronic mediocrity of real sex vs the beautifully obscene and lush variety of eccentric ways to ejaculate offered by the internet; online porn wins.

No wonder why online porn paved the way for the modern internet. And no wonder why sexually functional men and women prefer the internet for a quick wank-fix. Real sex is ants, online porn is satellites.

The reality is that Vanilla Porn is far more satisfying than reality when all the costs and risks are considered: The enjoyability of real sex fluctuates too much, there is no quality control, and the removal of the service is always unpredictable along with the also unpredictable risk of irreversible health problems.

Furthermore, there is the legal side of randomly becoming an ATM-sperm-donor-beast-of-burden after an “accidental” pregnancy, divorce or being falsely accused of rape then subjected to a trial by social media.

Why would you acquire an enormous debt only to become a manager of a dysfunctional fast food restaurant if all you wanted was one sexual burger?

Welcome to western marriage for straight guys. 

No. None of those risks are present in Porn (besides, stiffness in the arms is only temporary). Due to all of this, we are on the brink of a momentous and extraordinarily exciting filthy revolution: VR porn then fuck-bots.

But that is in the near future, let’s talk about our filthy present and the many shades of online porn available.

 

PORN PALETTES

9RKwqZT

As stated before, legal porn has a wide array of manifestations but the list is always incomplete and will keep growing as new “variants” of porn are created at least every 2 years. If there was an equivalent to Moore’s law for porn it would state,

“Pr0n’slaw is the observation that, over the history of online porn, the number of porn weirdness combined with paraphilias found in online communities and ecosystems, doubles approximately every two years”

That is to say that as technology progresses, so will porn weirdness. Many, many, maaaaany forms of porn are considered to be a paraphilia or overlap with several other paraphilias.

So far 549 paraphillias have been classified and the number of porn varieties that overlap, combine or modify one or several paraphilias just saturates the mind. (If internet porn had a body it would look like a sentient, omnivorous Chinese cuisine cookbook from hell that was high on meth+ PCP+Viagra, constantly churning out new untested porn recipes)

BTW the 549 number is just a place holder for what may very be a much higher number in offline reality. Yes, there may be legal sexual things so dark and filthy, that some of the people who exercise them may not be proud to share with the internet just yet. Just be patient, one of the X-Chans will eventually release those dark sexual Krakens, possibly as revenge porn.
But why are paraphillias important? Well because they are considered “mental disorders” and that is a key word for feminist radcunts to salivate like Pavlovian hounds at the opportunity of declaring all porn a “mental disorder”.

Let’s say you have developed (or were born with the potential for) the somehow “classy” paraphilia called Agalmatophilia (i.e. you exclusively want to sexually ravage polyester mannequins with untold polyester lust)

Is there a victim to your “weird” preference?

No. None.

red

Agalmatophilia vs as seen by RadNuns

Of course, the feminists would have a hard time convincing a polyester mannequin about suing the owner of the mannequin for “repeated, nonconcensual sandpaper condom-based polyester rape”. But that is where the feminists would want a “catch-all” law to avoid making themselves a laughing stock again (if doing more so were even possible) and make all porn illegal.

Remember, being a feminist means feeling life only but not thinking about it, it is all about impulsiveness and lack of reasoning. Being a feminists means demanding laws be passed with zero accountability for their repercussions, or as Nicholson put it,

NICHOLSON.png

But, which ones in the growing list of paraphilias truly are on the verge of being illegal? Which ones are not?Well that is where things are very flexible, (perhaps too flexible) if we are talking about two consenting adults. They can do as much as they want to themselves and to each other as long as they do not murder anybody (this unfortunately includes extremes such as self harm to name just one). However, this “flexibility” has to be calibrated with the laws of the country in question and the field of classification of mental disorders. That area of study requires the dispassionate reasoning feminists consistently lack.

Precisely because of that, feminists fail to understand the nature of porn; understanding human sexuality requires focus on reasoning and separation from emotion. But the act of dispassionate reasoning happens to be anathema to feminist dogma.

Any precise, granular reasoning is not to pass through their emotions. This puts them in a prison with no walls; their passion prevents them from observing or understanding their own mistakes, as well as objective reality as a whole. Even if it is in their best interest to understand it.

 

PORN-RAPE CORRELATION

hurry2 !

 

So what does porn do to men? Contrary to the church of feminism and its gospel, porn is more likely to be a deterrent to sexual “deviancy” because it works as junk food on its clients. It is immediate, it is easy to obtain and usually its users become “addicted” to it. That being said, it is more of a compulsion than an “addiction”, as much as you don’t have an “addiction to washing your hands” you rather have a “compulsion to wash hands” by the same token. “Porn Addiction” should be referred as a “compulsion to jerk off to porn”.

But the inconvenient truth about men who jerk off to porn on a regular basis,  is that they often get tired, they get headaches, penisaches and to top it off, they also get the post ejaculatory munchies. These “munchies” are somehow reminiscent to the munchies experienced by pothheads and the result is that, men who jerk off to porn, tend to gain weight. So in a nutshell, contrary to what Anita and her acolytes believe, porn does not beget sexual violence, quite the contrary possibly it prevents it. By the same token nothing gets mellower than males who jerk off to porn and are also potheads.

This mellow effect porn has on men works against Anita’s cult. Why? Because contrary to the tenets of the feminist religion, ever since the migration of porn from filthy & slippery movie theaters into living rooms in the early 80’s via Betamax and VHS tape-filth (then DVD then online porn ). The rates of sexual assault have been plummeting in the western world. The lack of access to online porn seems to increase sexual assault in other more traditional cultures. Almost as if the more religiously repressive the culture becomes, the more fucked up “unwanked” celibate men get, like crazy cows nobody milks.

Along with the fact that legalizing porn has also resulted in a perceived correlation in the reduction of sex crimes in several countries. However, the causation is still a matter of disagreement in many fronts. In short, online Porn may reduce rape but if you ask a feminist? That is always “problematic” or a “lie”. No, to them the only solution is to yell,

BAN ALL PORN!

The predictable accusation from feminists  (just like Anita who claims videogames cause sexual violence) would be that without porn, men would naturally rape. The simple answer is that would be unlikely, possibly because the estimated ~5% of the male population who were born/raised as serial rapists are very similar to serial killers: They are a very small percentage of criminals that terrify the confused masses. And no, you cannot teach them “not to rape”

But unlike serial killers, it would stand to reason the borderline sexual psychos (not the 5% serial rapists) would  just stay home, watch fucked up porn and jerk off and get fat on Doritos. Furthermore, if the porn-rape correlation is true, then that would be bad news for Anita, Why? Because videogames would also REDUCE not increase sexual violence with the borderline psychos.

But what do feminists do? Instead of seeing the benefits of massive quantities of fat and mellow gamer-porn-watcher-wankers along with the a few of the 5% of psycho-wankers getting also fatter everyday (thus unable to effectively chase and rape their victims) feminists are still outraged porn exists so pervasively.

Granted, many feminists are so fat that even the aforementioned fat mellow wankers would catch them. But again, why would they? Feminist godawfulboil-in-the-ass-ugliness renders them unrapeable. Even raping a desk would be more satisfying. Or like Natasha Leggero put it,

 

This is the end of part 2

Part 3 will deal with the filthy & “problematic” future of porn so stay tuned but if you are a feminist, you may give yourself a rectal fissure.

PS

Dear feminists: Stop clenching.

I hereby make these templates available for meme purposes, do with Anita the Nun whatever you please.

Feel free to treat her like an object because it is just a png file. 

Dear Readers: Share this article! Go! #UpsetAllAnitas !

Thank you for reading.

sub 2

BLANK

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: