Monthly Archives: January 2016

Lily Feng’s Last Delusion

1-720X340-cover-FENG_LAST DELUSION

DISCLAIMER 1

What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2

I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status.

For those who stayed, read on;

(EDITOR’S NOTE: Feel free to checkout Jack’s site)

Lilly Feng’s Last Delusion

 

-emotional delusion is the sould of suicide

At any given emotionally painful enough point in life, to most of us, suicide becomes an incredibly seductive “solution”.

Almost as if it whispered right into your ear and said:

“I alone am, the solution to all of your problems…”

See? Suicide is very persuasive at falsely convincing us that it can put an end to your all of our emotional suffering. We could be 100% physically healthy and still become obsessed with suicide. So much so that it eventually becomes a full-time undeclared religion for those in pain. Make no mistake, you will put all of your faith in that ultimate false hope; in it “ending” all the pain. But this process is gradual and far from noticeable while under the opium of emotions.

First, you wake up with the firm intention of living but then you catch yourself thinking about death, then you feel that intense guilt, then you punish yourself for even having entertained that thought. Usually, the intense guilt comes from failing to keep the promises you made to those who want you to stay alive because…Well, you “owe” them that. But you? You owe nothing to yourself.

Then something changes. One morning, you wake up with the firm intention of killing yourself but then you catch yourself thinking about living, then you punish yourself for even having entertained that thought. Yes. It very is subtle. Almost as subtle as a pinless grenade you gently put under your own pillow before you take that  nap you yearn. So much so most don’t even hear it ticking.

Those of us who have been unsuccessful at suicidal affairs know that the two possible outcomes. You either:

  • Try to commit suicide again and again until you get it “right”
  • Or will avoid it entirely

See, it could be a life-long avoidance or, just a temporary one until the delusion sets in again. Thing is, very very few of us are willing to admit that the delusion can happen once again and you will become obsessed with suicide. Almost as if it was a virus of the mind that could infect all of your ideas, abolish your will and irreversibly push you into self termination.

See? It is a delusion.

Also, do you see the convergence? Love and suicide live under the same roof of that vast and familiar empire of emotions. It is a majestic and sublime paradox, almost as if at birth we signed a contract with those tiny and trembling hands still drenched in amniotic fluid:

“I hereby agree that if I fail to love, I will kill myself.”

How does that work? Look at break ups, they seem to be one of the main factories of suicide for our species. All because they failed to yield children. Straight? Gay? Bi? Doesn’t matter, suicide is an equal opportunity employer for those who apply for the ultimate zero sum job.

See, people tend to mince words too much, but truth is, does not matter how smart you are, being young and broken hearted makes you stupid enough to commit suicide. The younger the dumber and the sadder the more delusional it makes you. You could be a fucking genius with a 145 IQ and still off yourself like an actual retard, all because of “feelz”.

See? Love and suicide go by the hand. The younger you are, the stronger they hold hands and the dumber they make you. Of course, we would like to think we control their grip but we are the ones that break under the pressure; we are just the often fragmented bones inside those hands. Love and suicide have quite an unforgiving  grip, sometimes fierce, sometimes murderous but people do not seem to mind when taking the gamble of loving someone. After all, those who never take risks never learn to love intensely.

But during a break up? Oh, that is the tightest grip, the one that fragments your emotions, shatters your reasoning and has a full-on collision with your will to live. But take heart! The more break ups you have, you either become more skillful and faster at putting the fragments back together or…you don’t and you just start throwing the pieces away: You no longer care about the jigsaw of life.

 

Don’t lie to yourself. Life is not pain avoidance, it is pain management.

I wish I had known and explained this jigsaw metaphor to now dead people I cared about. Those? Those were too successful at killing themselves. The women? Many of them said they would “kill themselves” too often and people just ignored them as the kind of women who would just “cry wolf” too often. The men? Those were a “little” different, most did not say anything until the body was found.

See, men and women just tend to be dimorphic about the way they perform their suicide but both share the same intense suffering. The kind of suffering that will  inexorably pushe them to kill themselves. It does not look like it but the outcome confirms it: Both men and women suffer intensely enough to kill themselves. Both men and women are invisibly confined into that prison without walls; their last emotional delusion. That confinement can last so many years that at some point, the only “freedom” they yearn is self termination. They become delusional inmates whose last full time job is to “escape” the prison of life because they actively yearn the delusional “freedom” of death.

Women tend to verbally announce more then use pills or less invasive forms of irreversible damage whereas men announce less and usually go for highly invasive forms of irreversible damage. So which one was worse in those I remember?

None. They are all dead.

The women tried so many times they eventually succeeded while the men tried just once and that was enough. BTW, here is where hypocrites try to compete and declare their gender the absolute victim. Truth is, men and women suffer equally otherwise they would not try to kill themselves. In an ideal world, men and women should receive equal help but they don’t.

Sometimes, the dimorphic roles are exceptionally reversed and women suffer in silence and off themselves in incredibly invasive ways (blunt force trauma by an incoming train like in Lily Feng’s case) or sometimes, it is the males that just take the pills. Same difference. Same lethal outcome.

 

What would you have done with Lily Feng if you could turn back the clock? I think you would have done the same and perhaps you would have tried to talk her out of it.

But would you have been certain she would never have tried again?

How long would you have baby-sat her?

Hours? Days? Months? Forever?

Be honest.

 

The hard truth is that some of us can learn vicariously but some others only by trauma (suicide included.) Doesn’t matter how hard you try to be persuasive, there is no guarantee you will succeed at preventing their suicide. The reality is that there is no “certificate” that states a suicidal person will not try again.

You should always try to help them but sooner or later you will have to make the admission they are the only ones responsible for staying alive.

The most disappointing part of this event? Even if I had had the opportunity to turn back the clock and explain the jigsaw of life to them, there is no guarantee of success. Some people can learn by verbal warnings, some people only by trauma. No matter how much you care about them, if they are determined to kill themselves, they will not stop trying until they succeed. Do not lie to yourself. You have no real control over their delusional actions.

Again, what are you gonna do? Baby sit them forever?

Perhaps Lilly would have overcome the emotional delusion that lead her into suicide. Or perhaps it would not have made a difference.

Furthermore, were Lilly’s emotions at that point reliable or just part of her ongoing delusion?

Can then emotions that cause these suicidal delusions be trusted?

Look at the people who had one failed suicide attempt and never ever tried again.

Which emotions are real? The ones that led to their failed suicide attempt or the ones that prevented it for the rest of that person’s life?

See? It is a delusion.

How about you reader? Are your emotions real?

Is this rage and this frustration that started the #ChooChooGate/#LillyGate/#RIPTrollingGate real?

Is this anger that motivates you real?

Your anger and emotional pain is like dreaming of going back in time to save Lily Feng from her own delusional emotions.

See? It is a delusion.

Nothing will ever give you closure.

Nothing.

 

 

Thank you for reading.

@CultOfVivian’s Open Letter to Traitor @LiberalLunacy Shannon

1-720X340-cover-VIVIANS_Open_letter

Hello_Traitor

@CultOfVivian’s Open Letter to traitor @LiberalLunacy Shannon

Ethan,

Everybody agrees you have no principles. You are a cancer to our community and quite honestly, the world would be a better place without you.

I know you will be the usual coward and will not publish this, but this is what I feel about Shannon’s betrayal to all of us on the side of GamerGate who, unlike you, still care about ethics and justice.

Open Letter to @liberal_Lunacy Shannon,

You have betrayed us all Shannon. You have  betrayed GamerGate, you have betrayed ethics and you  have betrayed your own humanity. The money I and others gave to your cause should have been enough to at least have reconsidered before you even tried to spread your poison with your “line in the sand” article. It hurts to feel betrayed by people like you Shannon, I really thought you were better than that. But then you tweeted this:

 

download

 

At this point you have caused me so much pain that I no longer know who is worse; you or Ethan Ralph. Your “line in the sand article” was not ethical, what you did to me and the rest of us was admitting you never cared for what we felt as human beings. You never admitted you caused us pain, you never admitted that by publishing that hurtful article you treated us like subhumans. Any decent human being would have at least tried to talk to us to obtain our permission to publish something so hurtful. Before contacting the cancer of GamerGate: Ethan Ralph.

By associating with him you have confirmed what you truly are; a cancer too. You are cancer to me, you are cancer to the justice of GamerGate and you are cancer to human kind itself.

Why would I have to respect you? You have hurt all of us. After we gave you our kindness, after we helped you with your stairlift with money we could have used for real charities, you betrayed us all. The minimum you owed us all was the decency of not talking about Lily or Sarah. You owed us the decency of leaving both subjects untouched.

You owed people like me the decency of not attacking us and not questioning our human qualities. I try to be the best human being I can. And in your case I even gave you money. After everything I did for you, after all this community has done for you, what did I get? Attacks and threats.

I did not deserve any of the abuse I have received because all I asked was human decency for Sarah. In my heart, I know I am not wrong because unlike you, I care about all people.

You owed us all the minimum decency of agreeing with the basic human decency we all strive for in GamerGate. I know you cannot understand this, but you cannot criticize our basic human decency, that is what I, for one, stand for. That is what you should have stood for. You should have been with us not against us. Now, it is too late, you are against us all. There is no going back.

Even if you gave us all our money back (which you should), even if you repaid all the money we KINDLY gave you for your stairlift, it would not be enough, you have caused too much pain. Much more than what you could imagine. Much more than what you can pay for both morally and financially.

I have tears in my eyes as I type this. You have attacked us all Shannon, you have not only hurt us but you have also caused us all irreparable emotional damage by abusing our trust. But to be honest, I no longer use the Gamergate HT anymore, because every time I do, I just get attacked by people like you. I no longer have to open myself to attacks because I know I can have a sense of morality and standards without tying myself to these people.

I am tired of being a kind person to people who betray me. From today on, I will be a nice person to people who deserve it. You do not deserve it because you are against human decency. I will tell you right now I am glad you are sick and you suffer. People like you deserve to suffer. I really hope at some point you get so sick you can no longer type your poison to hurt us all.

I hope Ethan Ralph also gets sicker than you and loses everything he ever had because I will do everything in my power to make sure he cannot hurt anybody else with his poisonous website. All the pain you have caused us all has finally made me understand that if YOU use any means necessary to make us suffer, we are justified to use ANY means necessary to cause you irreversible financial harm. If you have no limits, we should have no limits either.

People like you and Ethan deserve to be sick and end their days the worst way possible.

I know I am not alone in what I feel right and I know I am morally superior to all of you because, I know I don’t have it in me to cause this much pain to good people but you are not good people and you will pay for all the pain you have inflicted.

Thanks for all the pain you’ve caused.

Enjoy the stairlift Shannon.

Nicole Sund /@CultOfVivan

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

@

 

 

PS

Logically, the above letter is satire.

It also is an extrapolation of the extremely emotional tweets made by Nicole Sund AKA @CultOfVivan following’s Shannon’s article “A line in the sand” Yes, it was written by me Filthy Neo Troll Jack Outis not Ralph. Let me clarify:

TROLL_ACCOUNTABILITY_2

The satirical letter above is an is an exercise on Nicole Sund’s SJW implications  and predictable behavior. Which also happens to be an extension of the things feminists like her say without thinking. They just feel and react on impulse, like reptiles.

Logically, when Vivian sees this article, it will almost certainly be labelled “poison” but she will be very, very unlikely to elaborate on the implications she made in her original tweets.

Why? Because she would be shooting herself in her retarded radfem foot. What she should say is things like “that is hateful” or “that loser troll is reading too much into my tweets” or “he is creepy” she should also try to use her most common tactic: “I am being attacked”

Let’s go over her tweets and their implications to understand the reasoning behind the expansions applied to the letter above.

BTW When I was planning this piece, I came to the conclusion it had to be the kind of language a SJWs would relate to. BTW, if you are a SJW and while you were reading Nicole’s fake anger and you experienced a hate-hard on then a sudden loss of blood pressure, that was the point. The piece had to be not “over the top” to blend in. It had to be based on raw feelings and little else. The kind of thing feminists would write and almost immediately delete out of shame, someone as idiotic as Vivian herself. Logically, SJWs also need to justify their viciousness by using a tool called DARVO (Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender.) The more they revert the roles and accuse their target of “vile-inhumanity” the more leeway they give themselves to be as vicious as those meanies they “hate”.

Just like it happened to Chichiro dev, the leftist media avoided and ostracized her because she did not have the right kind of ideas feminist outlets were looking for. Shannon is like Chichiro Dev. and Cult of Vivan is the Leftist media. Vivian will never forgive the fact Shannon does not have the “right kind of ideas”.

 

1 Original Tweet:

 

Implication: Perfect DARVO

DARVO

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expansion: She is attacking a person but since she knows Shannon is handicapped she had to reverse the roles and paint Shannon as the attacker. As much feminists do, they replace the pronouns “I” and they instead use “us” using a collective gives the impression that Shannon “hurt” so many people, her handicapped status no longer factors in and she “has to pay”.

 

 

2 Original Tweet:

Implication: I am morally superior. I do not need your morals.

Expansion: Since Vivian considers herself morally superior anything goes because the more outraged she is the more justified she is to retaliate. Pure SJW “superior justice”

 

 

3 Original Tweet:

Implication: “we own you, therefore you can’t criticize us”

Expansion: We paid for your stairlift, I owe your opinions and ideas. Then Vivan closes with a nice DARVO. Oh Vivian, thanks to your hypocrisy Ralph can get a few thousand clicks. You idiot.

 

 

Thank you for reading.

 

The Illusion of Free Speech

DISCLAIMER 1

What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2

I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status.

For those who stayed, read on;

(EDITOR’S NOTE: Feel free to checkout Jack’s site)

xerxes

illusios-720x340-cover-l

The Illusion of Free Speech

Not long ago I was watching a remake of a certain iconic film. The remake itself was not that great but then a phrase from the dialogue caught my attention:

“It is the illusion of free will…”

In the context of the movie, a man is given the illusion of being able to choose what he does, but the choices are not the illusion; what is fake is his perception of choice.

Imagine you are that man, fully immersed in that illusion of free will. It’s almost as if someone was holding your hand but you never saw their giant invisible hands subtly and skillfully controlling all of your actions. You never saw their invisible giant hands simply because you never saw their invisible giant mind making your decisions for you either. Their giant mind skillfully guiding yours is what gave you that perfect illusion, again:

“it is the illusion of free will…”

It’s not like the character in the movie was restricted from making choices. Not at all, he actively tried and “succeeded” at making them. Because from his perspective, everything was “normal”.

However, in the context of the movie, he was living a carefully engineered daydream where all his choices had already been made. But his ability to notice had been removed thus, parts of his sentience were a fabrication.

How about you?

What if all of your choices are being made right now as you read this?

What if all of my choices were being made as well but neither you nor me were able to notice?

See, that would be better, that kind of ignorance would be bliss.

I’d much rather be oblivious to manipulation than being aware of it. But that is not the case. The reality is that we can witness how other people try to lie to us…How they try to control with very visible hands your actions. They try to hold your hand or my hand. The hand of censorship is quite clear, quite visible and quite easy to spot.

Take for example people who defend a law until their feelings get hurt. For example, people who pretend to defend free speech until someone says something against their religion. That is where free speech “has to end,” because feelings are more powerful.

I’d been thinking about the illusion of free will and how it may mirror the illusion of free speech before I decided to write this article. But what truly started it, was discussing what images to use for another unrelated article with Ethan Ralph. First we agreed the the word “Jew” could be misconstrued by hypocrites who visit this site in order to try to report it as “antisemitic.” Then, I suggested the term “Jewish People” but Ralph nixed that as well, suggesting I lay off that term, lest it also be twisted around by detractors. Finally, I haggled and said “Can I include the letter J?”

Ralph hesitated for about a minute, and responded with this:

” I don’t want references to Judaism in the cover, man.”

He then explained that his decision hinged upon the possibility that even the letter J could also be used against the site. There was a silence expressed by the lack of typing on both ends. Then I stared at my own last request with a certain degree of incredulity:

“Can I include the letter J?”

I asked Ralph this after the short pause:

“You do realize how far censorship is limiting your right to free speech, don’t you?”

He hesitated, but agreed with me. The reality is that the illusion of free speech would have been more desirable than being aware of the need to haggle for the inclusion of a mere J.

I can take letters and words out of articles over and over, but where does it end? How many concessions do I have to make to avoid “offending” someone religious?

See, this is their success at limiting ideas, because that in and of itself is the purpose of censorship. First it starts with limiting language, which in turn leads to the limitation of the ideas expressed. Simply put, if you lack the terms to express an idea, either you invent new ones, or you just do not express the idea. Does it stop there? No.

  • It starts with language
  • Then laws
  • Then ideas
  • Then people’s minds

For fuck’s sake! All we are doing on this site is publishing trashy critiques of pop culture and not even THAT passes the filter. Not even the letter J to reference the Jews.

It was truly sobering to see that even using polite words such as “Jewish People” was not enough. Because by doing that I already was conforming to PC dogma and not even that was sufficient. I can make concessions with words, as I said. But where does it end?

It doesn’t. That is the problem.

Religious people pretend they respect free speech but the reality is that they only serve one true master:

Their emotions.

Religious people can pretend they support free speech and be the most skillful of hypocrites, out there wearing their masks of virtue. But the moment they hear something that offends them? They drop the masks and want laws to change.

Their actions boil down to this:

BLASPHEMY
BLARGH!!!
THIS ATHEISM IS OFFENSIVE!
KILL THEM! IT IS ILLEGAL! BAN IT! 

 

Religious people usually go through 3 stages:  First they want those atheists killed, but then they reconsider. Instead of requesting murder they suggest putting them in jail, so they have to switch to claiming blasphemy is “illegal.” Since it is not, they have to settle for demands it be banned.

That applies to religious people but how about feminists? Yes, the same feminists that opposed sexy videogames at the beginning of GamerGate. How do they rank when compared to religious people?

Well, first, feminists pretend they respect free speech but the reality is that they only serve one true master:

Their emotions.

Feminists can pretend they support free speech and be the most skillful of hypocrites, out there wearing their masks of virtue. But the moment they hear something that offends them? They drop the masks and want laws to change.

Their actions boil down to this:

post 2

BLARGH!!!
THIS SEXY GAME IS OFFENSIVE!
BAN IT!

 

Guess what? Feminists usually go through the same 3 stages religious people do:  First they want those “misogynists” killed (#KillAllMen is not always a “joke”), but then they reconsider. Requesting murder would put them in jail, so they have to switch to claiming the sexy game is  “illegal.” Since it is not, they have to settle for demands it be banned.

How about other groups that react just like religious people or feminists?

See, here is the thing, I am not even talking about Jewish people or feminists at this point. I am talking about people in GamerGate that dislike free speech. I am comparing religious people with people in Gamergate because both serve the same master:

Their emotions.

Yes, this bears repeating: Anti-RalphRetort people pretend they respect Free Speech, but the reality is that they only serve one true master:

Their emotions.

STILL SKEPTICAL?

COMPARE

Anti-RalphRetort people can pretend they support free speech and be the most skillful of hypocrites, out there wearing their masks of virtue. But the moment they heard something that offended them? They dropped the masks and wanted TO KILL THE SITE.

Their actions boil down to this:

KILL THE SITE

BLARGH!!!
THIS #RipTroll POST IS OFFENSIVE!
KILL THEM! IT IS ILLEGAL! BAN IT!

*KILL THE SITE!!!

*KILL THE SITE!!!

 *KILL THE SITE!!!

Guess what? Anti-RalphRetort SJW GamerGaters WENT (and still go through) the same 3 stages religious people and feminists do:  First they want those “Trolls” killed, but then they reconsider that requesting murder would put them in jail, so they have to switch to claiming the #RIPTrolling post is “illegal.” Since it is not, they have to settle for demands for it to be banned.

Once the demands failed, they took matters into their own hands by trying to shut the site down.  False reports, AdSense brigades and tons of blatant lies until the money was cutoff…it was all “fair game”.

It was the online equivalent of burning someone else’s building because one of the tenants offended your feelings.

After all, the site owner was asking for it, right? 

Anything goes when your outrage justifies it…Right?

In essence, the owner of the site, Ethan Ralph, became the online equivalent of Satan incarnate. (Yes. I never expected Satan to be that fat either.)

How about the “pro free speech” Gamergaters? They turned into mob indistinguishable from hordes of feminists or religious people trying to hunt down their own designated “Satan”

Oh…But when you compare the actions of feminists to those of religious people, feminists tend to reply without thinking the following:

“OH NO! IT IS NOT THE SAME!”

Predictably, when you compare the actions of Anti-RalphRetort SJW GamerGaters to those of feminists, the Ralph haters also tend to reply without thinking the following:

“OH NO! IT IS NOT THE SAME!”

Wrong.

Of course is the same.

Different labels: Same behavior.

It is not what you say what counts. It is your actions.

Anti-RalphRetort SJWs behaved exactly as impulsively as the feminists and the religious zealots they claim to despise.

How? It only took one #RIPTroll article for Anti-RalphRetort SJW GamerGaters to drop their masks of virtue and behave exactly the same way feminists and religious people do, for them to say:

“That is “offensive”. BAN IT!”

Yes. The #RIPTroll article is 100% legal, yet you dear Anti-RalphRetort GamerGaters want it to disappear just as much as feminists want 100% legal games they dislike to also disappear.

The reality? Offensive free speech is still 100% legal free speech.

How many concessions do I have to make to avoid “offending” someone religious like you RalphHaters?

Answer: None. Fuck all of you. 

Getting offended has no intellectual value, hence this:

fry-offence

Thank you for reading.

NOTE TO HATERS:

SJWs like you believe you are fighting “injustice,” but you are just another  group of “offended” hypocrites without a real sense of purpose in life.

(But take heart, my purpose in life is to offend you all.)

Like this site, I am here to stay and frustrate you.

Fuck your censorship.

 

Neverlands

Why Amy Schumer is Standing on Patrice O’Neal’s Grave

DISCLAIMER 1

What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2

I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status.

For those who stayed, read on;

(EDITOR’S NOTE: Feel free to checkout Jack’s site)

TROLL_ACCOUNTABILITY_2

Schumer balloon

Why Amy Schumer is Standing on Patrice O’Neal’s Grave

It is hard to accept when someone you used to trust backstabs you. You gave them access to your work, to your friendship, and to a degree, your personal life. Then, they betray you and use all the information you gave them against you. First you smile in disbelief, then very slowly, your disappointment mixes with anger towards the traitor. Then it just spirals down from there.
Can it get worse? Of course it can. It is much worse when the traitor backstabs you after you have passed away, then makes millions of dollars by stealing your work. Not only that, but does so publicly and blatantly, that multiple people confront them, and what do they do? They keep lying.
To add insult upon the injury of pissing on your grave, the traitor does not even give a cent to your surviving family members and even has the gall to publicly deny over and over any wrongdoing by playing the victim. That level of dishonesty is truly hard to match, isn’t it?
Well, that is exactly what happened when feminist traitor Amy Schumer cynically stole several jokes from the late and extremely talented comedic legend Patrice O’Neal. She made millions from her HBO special (by the way, O’Neal wasn’t the only one she stole from) but has so far given ZERO dollars to Patrice’s family: Partner Vondecarlo Brown, mother Georgia, stepdaughter Aymilyon, and sister Zinder.
(BTW there is a yearly benefit to help Patrice’s family please buy tickets here. Also, please buy the upcoming documentary on Patrice O’Neal’s life.)
Schumer even had the gall to deny her theft and play the victim despite the fact her theft of Patrice’s work is blatant as fuck. Take a look:

How can someone like Amy Schumer become such a parasite? Why would Amy be gravestanding on Patrice O’Neal’s memory? Here are but a few of the reasons…

1

Amy Schumer is Jewish BUT very, very privileged

Oppressed jew

When it comes to Jewish people, some wrongly assume they all are middle class or rich. Truth is, in Israel they have a rising population of homeless people. And wherever you have homeless people, it is safe to assume you will have social classes. Where would Amy Schumer fit in the social strata if we put her in Israel? Well, since she was raised in a wealthy upper class home in Manhattan New York, she is also unlikely to have ever been homeless or one of the many unfortunate homeless drug addict females in Tel Aviv. But now that Schumer has amassed millions of dollars from movies and HBO specials she may “reveal” struggles from her past, the kind of things feminists falsely do to create pity before they start selling a memoir and make millions again. But Amy Schumer’s chances of having been poor enough to sleep on the streets and almost freeze to death or  homeless without a chance of making ends meet are slim to none.
Simply put, Amy Schumer would be rich as fuck if we put her in Israel.
But this begs the question: How can someone so privileged and fortunate be so lazy as to steal Patrice O’Neal’s work? Well that would lead to reason number 2.

 2

Amy Schumer’s Slow Decline Into Mediocrity

 

2006.jpg

 

 

We have all met women who looked youthful and attractive then at some point, something horrid happens and they just start growing outwards, swelling uncontrollably. But even worse, they become blind to their own lack of fitness. Amy Schumer went through the same stages when she was an unknown in 2006. Back then, she had to put some effort to stay attractive and relevant. But as certain feminist trends progressed and as the glorification of mediocrity increased in the last 10 years, her fashionable fatness kept swelling along with her bank account. The process of irreparable complacency did not stop with her first 20 pounds of overweight as we will see in number 3.

3

Amy Schumer became a “do nothing bitch”

DO NOTHING BITCH.jpg
As athlete Ronda Rousey put it “do nothing bitches” tend to just be pretty and try to fuck rich guys to become “trophycumbuckets”. The reality is that “Do nothing bitches” are glorified social parasites with a vulva. As soon as they get the money, they stop trying and get either fat, pregnant, or both. The same thing happened to Amy Schumer. She just got the money by telling jokes (instead of bagging a rich guy) and then stopped trying. Think about it with from a retarded feminist point of view, why would she try? What for? She is already “number 1”. Right?
why try harder
If Amy Schumer was male 
See, that’s the problem with money. Sometimes it makes its owners blind to their own fatal flaws. Being fat may look “cute” in Amy Schumer’s case, because that’s what feminism has been falsely telling women. It’s “OK to be fat” regardless of the dire health consequences. It is almost as if we were not talking about adults.

4

Amy Schumer is a not an adult, she is a childish feminist without integrity

fat piggy
Feminism prevents reasoning and as a result, the individuals infected with it become infantilized. They simply lack the discipline to accept their own bad decisions and they often make the bad decision of avoiding exercise.
Feminists are like fat children that prefer candy instead of real food. Amy Schumer is not far from that, like many other feminists, her diet is mostly whatever junk food children age 7 eat.
Here is the fatal flaw: Feminism does not tell women that they don’t look cute when they are “chubby”. Quite the opposite, feminism tells them that:

Looking like a standing pig is a reason for “pride”

Amy Schumer is the perfect example of a stunted adult, intelligent enough to play tricks on stage but blind enough to believe the lies that feminism tells her. But wait, if a woman like Schumer makes mistakes or makes herself look like a buffoonish-pig, in the feminist language she is not an idiot, she is “brave”. No wonder feminists are so mentally infantilized, they “never” make mistakes, it is either “bravery” or the “patriarchy” but nothing is ever their fault.

5

Amy Schumer is an American role model for mediocrity

EMMA WATSON FEMINISM

WHAT FEMINISM TELLS WOMEN

“It doesn’t matter what you do, if you believe in yourself you WILL NEVER BE ugly or dumb” 

That is in a nutshell what feminism falsely teaches women: Glorified mediocrity & laziness is as fashionable as feminism itself. Amy Schumer’s allegiance to the religion of feminism and her brand of “fashionable” weight gain are directly related. But the problem is that this allegiance to unhealthy habits leads women into religious delusions like this:

scale smashing

By their flawed logic #FatAcceptance feminists cannot be wrong, because they have justification for nearly everything:

GYMS ARE LIES BY THE PARTRIARCHY

Amy Schumer is the embodiment of feminism’s #FatAcceptance of physical mediocrity. See, the problem with wealthy idiots is that they influence the dirt-poor idiots. Unlike most people, Amy Schumer was born in a privileged set of circumstances. Being lazy, overweight, “funny,” and sexually promiscuous sells her brand, but the average Jane?  She does not have her millions and often ends up believing she can do all of the above without paying any consequences.
How about the average Jane facing the reality of unwanted pregnancies? What Schumer’s brand of false pride fails to tell the average Jane is that being fat makes them progressively unattractive and hard to fuck. It gets worse, being morbidly obese smelly and hairy makes them just godawful-boil-on-the-ass-ugly and sexually repulsive. How about hypertension, diabetes, and heart attacks? Amy should also tell her feminist followers her delusional brand also prevents all health problems related to obesity.
Oh wait, that would be a lie just like feminism itself.

6

Amy Schumer feels so inferior, she envies Jerry Seinfeld

Jerry Seinfeld is also a jew but far, far wealthier and more talented than Amy Schumer. But she “feels” that is unfair because Seinfeld “somehow” discriminates her. Witness how she spectacularly struggles to make sense of her feminist child-like feelings, (while Joe Rogan keeps giving her rope to hang herself) trying to accuse the “horrible greedy Seinfeld Jew” for not giving her his money. (skip to minute 9:30)

Holy fuck, if you thought the HT #GiveMoneyToWomen was idiotic, now you know where it came from: Feminist parasites with childish minds like Amy Schumer.
See? Like most feminists, Schumer connects her perception of the world to her childhood and her current child-like feelings, because she conveniently forgets she is not a child anymore. Like most feminists she wants to be the feminist Peter Pan, the eternal child with all the legal rights but none of the responsibilities.

Obviously,  here is the little quote from Jerry Seinfeld after he was accused by feminists of only “hiring white males” for his show. Almost as if the same feminists wanted him to #GiveMoneyToWomen because “patriarchy” reasons.

Jerry Seinfeld

7

Amy Schumer is a PARASITE joke thief just like Carlos Mencia

MENCIA THIEVES

Just like Amy Schumer, Carlos Mencia was a fat fuck thief that would regularly and blatantly steal other comedian’s jokes. Just like Amy Schumer, Mencia was a fat fuck who lacked the discipline to work out or put down the carbs, hence the need to steal: Lazy fat fuck behavior.
If the fat fuck is too lazy to exercise, often they will be too lazy to write their own material and will instead start stealing. That is what Mencia did until Joe Rogan famously confronted him on stage and Joe Rogan gave Carlos Mencia the most majestic and painful public sodomization in the story of comedy (so far) and exposed the liar Mencia is. It was painful to watch but 100% earned. Behold Carlos Mencia’s rectal trainwreck courtesy of Joe Rogan’s throbbing & unstoppable verbal Jiu-Jitsu:

After the public verbal sodomization Joe Rogan gave him, Mencia partially cleaned up his still bleeding act and lost the weight all thanks to the public disgrace he experienced. (but to this day, he still walks funny.)
Unlike Mencia, Amy Schumer is very, very unlikely to be confronted on stage the way Mencia was because she is a woman and telling her she is a fucking thief would be “abusive & misogynistic”.
See? Women are not supposed to have accountability or integrity because feminism makes them big children in the bodies of adult women. BTW don’t forget to #GiveMoneytoWomen because “patriarchy”. (Nah, just trolling… Just fuck feminism with a rusty crowbar)

CONCLUSION

CLOSING
Picture Note: Yes, Amy Schumer is eating a pastry while “exercising”
So, let’s put two and two together: You have a feminist like Amy Schumer, who was born rich and privileged. She also has a giant inferiority complex AND a giant chip on her feminist shoulder against male comedians like Jerry Seinfeld. Add to that the fact she is visibly lazy, overweight and complacent. Therefore it would stand to reason that if she CLEARLY does not have the discipline to put down the carbs much less to sit down and write her own HBO special. It would make more sense that she ran out of time and instead of writing her HBO special, she sat down to watch other people’s work and blatantly stole joke after joke.
Possibly, her inflated ego made her believe nobody would notice OR that people would not dare criticize such a “cute & pudgy” thief-comedienne.

Oh Amy Schumer, you truly are a spectacular feminist idiot if you expected the internet to believe you. 

We could spend all day debating whether her if nearly identical jokes are an act of theft or not while feminist like Schumer would keep lying and playing victim on her behalf.
But to save time, let’s use the principle of Occam’s razor, which states that the simplest explanation is very often the most likely to be true. Let’s consider the following two case scenarios for Schumer’s potential act of theft:
A) Amy Schumer was visited by the ghost of Patrice O’Neal who became a feminists in the afterlife and the now feminist ghost of Patrice confessed to Amy Schumer he felt guilt for the thousands of  rape jokes he cracked throughout his career and as a form of atonement, Patrice’s ghost gave Schumer permission of using ALL of his jokes as long as she did not give his family any money right away because Patrice also wanted to prank them all the way to the year 2035.
 
B) Amy Schumer is a lazy fat fuck who stole Patrice’s jokes.

I do not know about you, but I am gonna go for option B because I have never seen a ghost but I have seen plenty of fat liars, especially feminists.

 

 

How dare you stand on Patrice O’Neal’s Grave Amy Schumer?

You spectacularly dishonest human being.

 

 
 Thank you for reading.

 BONUS

Dedicated to Amy Schumer

 

 

The Last Delusion

DISCLAIMER 1

What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2

I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status.

For those who stayed, read on;

TROLL_ACCOUNTABILITY_2

The Last Delusion

 

-emotional delusion is the sould of suicide

At any given emotionally painful enough point in life, to most of us, suicide becomes an incredibly seductive “solution”.

Almost as if it whispered right into your ear and said:

“I alone am, the solution to all of your problems…”

See? Suicide is very persuasive at falsely convincing us that it can put an end to your all of our emotional suffering. We could be 100% physically healthy and still become obsessed with suicide. So much so that it eventually becomes a full-time undeclared religion for those in pain. Make no mistake, you will put all of your faith in that ultimate false hope; in it “ending” all the pain. But this process is gradual and far from noticeable while under the opium of emotions.

First, you wake up with the firm intention of living but then you catch yourself thinking about death, then you feel that intense guilt, then you punish yourself for even having entertained that thought. Usually, the intense guilt comes from failing to keep the promises you made to those who want you to stay alive because…Well, you “owe” them that. But you? You owe nothing to yourself.

Then something changes. One morning, you wake up with the firm intention of killing yourself but then you catch yourself thinking about living, then you punish yourself for even having entertained that thought. Yes. It very is subtle. Almost as subtle as a pinless grenade you gently put under your own pillow before you take that  nap you yearn. So much so most don’t even hear it ticking.

Those of us who have been unsuccessful at suicidal affairs know that the two possible outcomes. You either:

  • Try to commit suicide again and again until you get it “right”
  • Or will avoid it entirely

See, it could be a life-long avoidance or, just a temporary one until the delusion sets in again. Thing is, very very few of us are willing to admit that the delusion can happen once again and you will become obsessed with suicide. Almost as if it was a virus of the mind that could infect all of your ideas, abolish your will and irreversibly push you into self termination.

See? It is a delusion.

Also, do you see the convergence? Love and suicide live under the same roof of that vast and familiar empire of emotions. It is a majestic and sublime paradox, almost as if at birth we signed a contract with those tiny and trembling hands still drenched in amniotic fluid:

“I hereby agree that if I fail to love, I will kill myself.”

How does that work? Look at break ups, they seem to be one of the main factories of suicide for our species. All because they failed to yield children. Straight? Gay? Bi? Doesn’t matter, suicide is an equal opportunity employer for those who apply for the ultimate zero sum job.

See, people tend to mince words too much, but truth is, does not matter how smart you are, being young and broken-hearted makes you stupid enough to commit suicide. The younger the dumber and the sadder the more delusional it makes you. You could be a fucking genius with a 145 IQ and still off yourself like an actual retard, all because of “feelz”.

See? Love and suicide go by the hand. The younger you are, the stronger they hold hands and the dumber they make you. Of course, we would like to think we control their grip but we are the ones that break under the pressure; we are just the often fragmented bones inside those hands. Love and suicide have quite an unforgiving  grip, sometimes fierce, sometimes murderous but people do not seem to mind when taking the gamble of loving someone. After all, those who never take risks never learn to love intensely.

But during a break up? Oh, that is the tightest grip, the one that fragments your emotions, shatters your reasoning and has a full-on collision with your will to live. But take heart! The more break ups you have, you either become more skillful and faster at putting the fragments back together or…you don’t and you just start throwing the pieces away: You no longer care about the jigsaw of life.

 

Don’t lie to yourself. Life is not pain avoidance, it is pain management.

I wish I had known and explained this jigsaw metaphor to now dead people I cared about. Those? Those were too successful at killing themselves. The women? Many of them said they would kill themselves too often and people just ignored them as the kind of women who would just “cry wolf” too often. The men? Those were a “little” different, most did not say anything until the body was found.

See, men and women just tend to be dimorphic about the way they perform their suicide but they both suffer so intensely that they off themselves. Both men and women suffer so intensely in that prison without walls, in that emotional delusion that self termination becomes their full-time job.

Women tend to verbally announce more often then use pills or less invasive forms of irreversible damage whereas men announce much less often and usually go for highly invasive forms of irreversible damage. So which one was worse in those I remember?

None. They are all dead.

The women tried so many times they eventually succeeded while the men tried just once and that was enough.

 

BTW, here is where hypocrites try to compete and declare their gender the absolute victim. Truth is, men and women suffer equally otherwise they would not try to kill themselves. In an ideal world, men and women should receive equal help but they don’t.

Sometimes the dimorphic roles are exceptionally reversed and women suffer in silence and off themselves in incredibly invasive ways or sometimes, it is the males that just take the pills. Same difference. Same lethal outcome.
The most disappointing part? Even if I had the opportunity to turn back the clock and explain the jigsaw of life to them, there is no guarantee I would have succeeded. Because when it comes to discouraging someone fully determined to kill themselves, there is no guarantee of success.

Some people can learn by verbal warnings, some people only by trauma. No matter how much you care about them, if they are determined to kill themselves, they will not stop trying until they succeed. Do not lie to yourself. You have no real control over their delusional actions.

Some of us learn vicariously, some by trauma (suicide included.) Doesn’t matter how hard you try to be persuasive, there is no guarantee you will succeed at preventing their suicide. The reality is that there is no “certificate” that states a suicidal person will not try to off themselves again.

You should always try to help them but sooner or later you will have to make the admission they are the only ones responsible for staying alive.

Besides, what are you gonna do?

Baby-sit them forever?

Think of the men and women that committed suicide in your lifetime so far, what would you do if you had the opportunity to turn back the clock? I think you would also try to talk them out of it. But would you have been certain that person would never have tried to kill themselves again?

How long would you have baby-sat them?

Hours? Days? Months? Forever?

Be honest.

Perhaps that person in your life would have overcome the emotional delusion that led them into suicide. Or perhaps it would not have made a difference.
Furthermore, imagine that person’s last moments before killing themselves.

Were that person’s emotions at that point reliable or just part of their ongoing delusion?

Can then emotions that cause these suicidal delusions be trusted?

Can a person in that state be trusted?

Look at the people who had one failed suicide attempt and never tried again.

Which emotions are real? The ones that led to their failed suicide attempt or the ones that prevented suicide for the rest of that person’s life?

See? It is a delusion.

How about you hateful reader?

Are your emotions real?

Is this anger that motivates you real?

See? It is a delusion.

Nothing will ever give you closure.

Nothing.

 

 

Thank you for reading.

#UpsetAllAnitas: How to Upset the Left (INTRO) 3 of 3

DISCLAIMER 1: What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2: I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status. For those who stayed, read on;

(This article was featured at theralphretort.com)

TROLL_ACCOUNTABILITY_2

#UpsetAllAnitas: How to upset the left intro part 3 of 3.

Part1         Part2       Part3

NUN FREQUENCY

 

 

taunt Campaigns

gay troll

 

Following the guidelines we discussed in parts 1 and two of these series, I’d like to propose a list of #Taunt campaigns where we emulate the same 3 stages (ideally without having to actually have any Jews beat up by murderous trannies). Instead it would have to be precisely executed via butthurt #Taunt campaigns which would feature the following stages:

 

  • #Wound their Ego
  • #Taunt Them
  • #Expose Them

 

However, there is twist. Remember that SJWs/Leftists have one weapon?

Yes, they play the victim.

That weapon would have to be preemptively taken away. All of these proposals have to feature exactly that: Preemptively taking away the chance of them playing the victim.

How? Simple. They have to feel ridiculous to even entertain the thought of playing the victim. We will call this twist *the prestige. Here is an example:

Milo Yiannopoulos faces a feminist during a live show, he calls one of them “Darling.” Feminists lose their shit but they secretly know it would be ridiculous to claim Milo is a misogynist because he is gay as fuck therefore *the prestige Milo uses is knowing he takes away their “play victim” weapon. Behold his thuggish fabulousness:

 

Just in case you missed the faces feminists made when they were disrespected by the word “Darling”:

 

See, the taunting did not stop at the TV show. Milo took it to online media by Tweeting this taunt to radfem @Cruella1 (the one that looks like an ugly nun in civilian clothes)

 

 

 

Allow me to elucidate Milo’s *prestige tactics visually:

notice the trolling

Milo is a prime example of what it means to troll radfems until they expose themselves. He taunts them until they expose their violent vicious nature behind their facade of kind and harmless Neo-nuns for “equality”.

As previously stated, once feminists are upset, they become vicious and show their true colors. Usually, when feminists/SJWs become enraged enough on social media they will start making:

  • Physical assault threats
  • Threats through #KillAllMen genocidal “jokes”
  • Threats through #PenisMutilation “jokes”
  • Thinly veiled death threats
  • Thinly veiled rape threats (if you are female)

See, feminists are easily carried away by their raw emotions and if properly manipulated, they will do exactly that which they claim to oppose: Threats of violence.

Want proof? After the Dr. Drew Show, Robert-Zoey Tur was so enraged that he challenged Ben Shapiro to go to the parking lot to give him the beating he deserved. Guess what? Since the “filthy Jew” Shapiro declined his offer, Robert-Zoey Tur went to social media and agreed he wanted to give “filthy Jew” Shapiro the pure Nazi curb-stomping he deserved. Behold:

 

curb stomping

In case you did not know what “curb-stomping” means, here is Edward Norton’s character from the film “American History X” curb-stomping a “filthy black” 

curb stomping

 

Because, let’s be truly progressive, what else do Jews deserve other than what Neo-Nazis do right Robert-Zoey Tur?

Wew…First physical assault threats, then an invitation to a fight in a parking lot then a threat of blunt force trauma to the head which would have resulted in a broken teeth, jaw, neck and almost certain death. Tsk, tsk, tsk…How unladylike of you Robert-Zoey Tur.

See? All Ben shapiro had to say to enrage Robert-Zoey Tur was just one simple question:

“What are your genetics, sir?”

Then Robert-Zoey Tur was enraged enough to smear itself not only on TV but also on social media. See? All you have to do is give these “peaceful leftists” enough rope and they will hang themselves.

Want another example of  “giving rope” to an enraged feminist on social media? Something similar happened to radfem Kola Boof who threatened to kill and mutilate multiple antifeminists who opposed her feminism. Just in case that was not vicious enough, Kola also threatened to commit acts of cannibalism with the remains of the women she threatened to kill.

See, the inconvenient truth is that, deep down, feminists also want to execute those who insult their feminist religion. Sounds familiar? Behold:

Koola Boof mutilation

But of course we should not take threats from feminists seriously! After all they are all just like children right? Oh wait, women are legally equal to men. Too bad impulsive feminists like Zoey or Kola think of themselves “as above the law”. They are not.

Remember: Your job is to keep calm and taunt feminists like Robert-Zoey Tur or Kola Boof until they have a meltdown & show their true colors THEN you archive and screenshot their threats.

You have to expose them the way I am doing it right now because both Robert-Zoey Tur & Kola will be notified of this article on social media. Both will be upset and who knows? Maybe they will have another meltdown or will start lying again. It won’t matter. It is all about exposing them.

Some of the following proposals may be more feasible than others but feel free to modify them or even suggest new ones in the comment section.

 

 

 

CAMPAIGN 1

#MILO RAPED MY FEELINGS

This is one of the simplest taunt campaigns. Just quote a feminist who is complaining about something Milo said. Then add the hashtag #MiloRapedMyFeelings at the end. Example:

nero raped mah feelings

STAGES

  1. #WOUND FEMINISTS’ EGOS:  Go to @Nero’s feed and dot-reply or just retweet their grievances. The fucker is very prolific so there is no shortage of those. Remember to add the “TRANSLATION: #NeroRapedMyFeelings” at the end of your retweet. Attaching this picture every time you call the feminist/SJW “darling” would also be helpful: nano-darling
  2. #TAUNT FEMINISTS’ ANGER: The intention is to “trigger” feminists by using the word “rape” WHILE removing your accountability as you clearly stated it was a metaphor about feelings not actual sexual assault. Remember, not to swear and just tell the feminist things like “Oh cupcake, don’t take #NeroRapedMyFeelings so seriously, it was just a joke” or something like: “Calm down darling, you take metaphoric rape too seriously” The more you call them “darling” the more you remind them of Nero and the more likely they are to explode. Once they become vicious, they usually go for out-of-the-blue comments on your penis size or just for direct penis mutilation “jokes”or #KillAllMen “jokes.” You should welcome their penis-related comments with comebacks like “Darling, why do you bring cock to unrelated conversations? Why the obsession?” Remember, your job is to taunt them until they explode.
  3. #EXPOSE THEIR TRUE COLORS: While you are taunting them, open another tab and go to archive.is. And as soon as the radfem or SJW you are taunting snaps, copy the link to their tweet, change tab and archive it. I cannot stress this enough ARCHIVING THEIR VICIOUSNESS IS A MUST OR ELSE THEY WILL ERASE THEM. Don’t waste time retweeting or telling friends of the threats the SJW just made, because 99% of the time, SJWs will erase them. Remember, we are not dealing with rational people, they work on impulse and their anger is a premature orgasm, as soon as they “come” they will have second thoughts, feel guilty and erase it.

Lulz are had.

trolls are had

 

CAMPAIGN 2

HUMOR IS A SIN:

CANNIBALS ARE THE SOLUTION

 

 

Patrice O’Neal’s brilliant Pepsi Cola Rapist joke is a perfect example of a “ethnic-cannibal joke.” We have a black guy cracking jokes about black guys or in other words, we have the member of a minority cannibalizing his own minority. White feminists and SJWs? They can’t even complain about “racism” because it is a member of the same minority  cracking jokes about the exactly same minority. As a result the SJWs and feminists just choke on their anger because they can barely criticize someone who is telling cannibal jokes. It was just brilliant, like Patrice himself. (Fuck! You are sorely missed you majestically vulgar iconoclast. May your memory last forever. Patrice O’Neal.)

I propose a marathon of the most offensive, most racist jokes told ONLY by cynically ethnic cannibals AKA “ethno-cannibal joke squad.”

  • Black people tell the most racist anti-#BlackLivesMatter black jokes.
  • Asians tell  the most scathing jokes about bad driving.
  • Mexicans tell the most merciless jokes about illegal Mexicans.
  • Gay men tell the most discriminatory jokes about homos.
  • Women tell the most unapologetically misogynistic rape jokes.
  • Indians tell the most unforgiving curry-smelling jokes.
  • Muslims tell suicide-bomber jokes.
  • Whites tell white trash jokes.
  • And so on

The purpose is to hold leftists hostage and preemptively preclude them from complaining about discrimination or racism because it would ONLY be the matching minorities telling jokes about themselves.

THE ONLY RULE: Only minorities cannibalize their own matching minority-specific jokes. Zero minority mixing.

The success of this operation hinges upon this rule. Failure to do so will result in the left being given ammo for their hypocrisy and calling #GamerGate racist. If properly executed, the left would be as mortified as restrained vegans being force-fed meatloaf.

Predictably, out of their unbridled outrage, the SJWs will impulsively promote this. Breitbart may benefit especially if it is done for a good cause. These #CannibalJokeMarathon‘s could become monthly events. These are the suggested stages to follow;

 

STAGES

  1. #WOUND FEMINISTS’ EGOS: The internet, reddit and Twitter and everything else is combed to gather a giant list of effective short offensive jokes.  The the audience votes to weed out mediocre jokes and only the best jokes are put in a final list of ~300 or more jokes. Jokes are split by gender and ethnic packs then EXCLUSIVELY given to the matching groups. Nobody knows exactly who is will read what. Video submissions that follow the one rule are also accepted but only the best ones will be played during the live stream.
  2. #TAUNT FEMINISTS’ ANGER#BIGMILO-like marathon starts by Milo reading the one rule out loud for all participants to to follow. Only trusted guests (who will abide by the rule and that received matching jokes) are invited to ensure they will not derail the event. Ethnic cannibals eat their own kind with the best jokes LIVE and the best prerecorded video submissions are interspersed with the live event to give live guests coffee & pee breaks. The best jokes are archived from the live chat for the next marathon. The onslaught of political incorrectness  swarms social media as the #CannibalJokeMarathon starts trending. The left is rectally wounded. Then, Buzzfeed, Salon, The Daily Beast and all the rest of the leftist online outlets have a collective rectal meltdown. Then Breitbart traffic surges. The second cannibal marathon is even more outrageous and features black people wearing blackface and bright red lipstick while telling the most offensive yet funniest jokes about black people. Same applies to women who tell tell rape jokes while preparing sandwiches while chained to the kitchen. The left explodes and wants Milo removed from the internet. Milo laughs his way to the bank.
  3. #EXPOSE THEIR TRUE COLORS: Logically, outraged SJWs will be so offended, so rectally wounded that they very likely use racist attacks themselves against the members of minorities telling the jokes, said racist attacks will be continuously archived and the best ones are compiled into a list. The screenshot of each offending tweet is manipulated. First the photo of the original SJW is changed from a minority to a generic photo of a “white privileged male”. The result? A perfectly offensive tweet originally composed by a minority SJW that looks as racist as it can get with the original twitter handle left intact.  Then, all the manipulated tweets are compiled into a “wall of abuse” which is sent back to online leftist snake pits like Buzzfeed. As expected they won’t do their job and check the source. Leftist outlets like Salon.com or Buzzfeed are then asked to report all of the “racist attacks”. The result? The outlets bite the taunt campaign hook line and sinker then think the “white cis males” are real and get the minority SJWs suspended instead.  Then the whole strategy is revealed on a youtube video, then Buzzfeed is exposed and will have to retract the story.

stage 2

trolls are had

Lulz are had.

 

 

 

 

Now go and #UpsetAllAnitas but before you do…

Remember: When dealing with the left and its regressive SJWs this is a rule to live by.

NEVER RETREAT BENJAMIN JOWETT

 

This is the end of part 3

Thank you for reading.

Now get to work.

End of part 3

#UpsetAllAnitas: How to Upset the Left (INTRO) 2 of 3

DISCLAIMER 1: What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2: I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status. For those who stayed, read on;

(This article was featured at theralphretort.com)

TROLL_ACCOUNTABILITY_2

#UpsetAllAnitas: How to upset the left intro part 2 of 3.

Part1         Part2       Part3

NUN FREQUENCY

As you may remember, on part one of this series, we analyzed the hypocrisy of the left and their rotten transapples which just give a bad name to their own glorified transcommunity. We also reviewed how people like Ben Shapiro managed to expose one of them (Zoey-Robert Tur) on Dr. Drew’s show. The way Shapiro manipulated Tur was by manipulating and taunting until Tur exploded. Again, you need to provoke and taunt leftists until they expose themselves. That is in and of itself the essence of Sun Tzu’s quote,

master― Sun Tzu

However if you are going to embark into this journey, you must also remember this:

Your enemy’s anger and ego are their burden. But If you want to win, cut all ties to your anger and ego. They are a burden.

header 4 (copy)

 

screenshot4

Having no emotions is a fallacy. 99% of all human beings have them. The difference is, some learn to control them better and some have ZERO intention of learning to control them. Hence the emotional behavior of ​ feminists and SJWs​. They live in a fictional world made of feelings. They are mere slaves to their emotions. SJWs do not control their emotions, their emotions make their decisions for them.

SJWs tend to have little or no emotional discipline, so much so, that even mere text “triggers” them. If emotions were food, SJWs would be morbidly obese compulsive eaters and emotional discipline would be daily exercise. Just like morbidly obese people who claim exercise would turn them into “muscular monsters”, SJWs claim emotional discipline would turn them into “emotionless monsters”

If you want to be better than SJWs, you have to have emotional discipline. It is not a choice, it is a must.
No need to sugar coat it: If you lack the emotional discipline to ignore insults you will fail miserably. If you are impulsive, you will fail.

 

Yes, if you cannot control your emotions, you will be defeated. Do not lie to yourself. Don’t embark on this journey if your sails are full of impulsive and emotional holes.

This begs the question, how do you train yourself against the delusion of your own negative emotions?

Simple. You gradually expose yourself to them.

Imagine feminists are annoying-as-fuck talking spiders and every time you see one, you just want to grab a shoe and smash the fuck out of it. Not really a phobia but close. This urge is clearly a problem because, while desireable, smashing them with shoes is not a solution. The urge to avoid feminists drivel is a problem because feminists won’t stop talking any time soon. So what is the solution to the urge to smash an annoying-as-fuck feminist talking spider?

In psychology they call it graduated exposure therapy. But in plain English it means that you desensitize yourself. If something annoys or scares you, you start by exposing yourself little by little to that thing that causes you a problem until you desensitize yourself. There are many methods to desensitize yourself  but let’s keep it practical and simple: All you need is Youtube.

Laci green

STAGE 1

  • Watch 5 minute chunks of of hard-core retarded feminist content on Youtube (Laci Green or Anita Sarkeesian videos or shit like that)
  • Force yourself to watch the whole 5 minutes without flinching or reacting, just take notes.
  • Remember: Force yourself to remain silent and not to react. Zero pauses, zero reactions, zero facial gestures. Only notes.

At first, this is quite challenging but If you manage to slowly train yourself to witness their idiocy without falling prey to your emotions, you will gradually build a much higher tolerance to their verbal poison. In time, you will be able to increase your time to 10 or even 15 minutes.

While high tolerance is not immunity, the moment your tolerance allows you to watch more than 10-15 minutes then you may be able to move to the next stage:

STAGE 2

Pause the video then verbally reply with a well reasoned argument, no swearing, just be blunt and and direct based on the notes you took. Imagine you are having a debate with them and you are replying to their delusions in front of an audience. Yes, it makes you look like a nutjob to reply to a computer screen, but just do it alone and train yourself to react less and master your emotions. I assure you, there is no shortage of retarded feminist content on youtube.

 

And, no, I am not a fucking Zen Buddhist. I just realized long ago that feminists and SJWs almost never train their emotional discipline. Look at them, they live a false emotional reality where mere text like this “triggers” them. If you want to be better than them, you need eliminate your emotional weaknesses to defeat them. You have the right to be angry, but your anger has no right to do your thinking. Always be a cobra, never a raging ape. You are the master and commander of the ship and your fury should only be a secondary tool. Master Hitchens put it best:

The finest fury

 

 

 

 

header 3

 

Because of Sun Tzu and Hitchens, (and secondarily because of people like Shapiro), I have been wondering how to manipulate and defeat feminists like Anita Sarkeesian and her acolytes. The hypothetical ideal plan would be an undercover recording of how she is coached by Jonathan Mcintosh during her rehearsals pre-shows and pre FemFreq recordings. The ideal would be to record them red-handed in the act of planning their lies. The plan would go like this:

  • Secretly record them when they are plotting
  • Then clandestinely release said recording, showing how she is spoonfed everything she has to say.

Such recording would expose her as the glorified puppet she is, taking away her victimhood in the process. But that in and of itself is a contradiction because the target should not be the puppet but the puppeteer : Jonathan McIntosh.

Nevergo full mac

Granted, McIntosh is so far into the left, he has made himself a laughing stock and an internet meme that when people speak in extreme emotional absolutes, they are referred as gone #FullMcIntosh. He is so irrational that instead of saying #NeverGoFullRetard we could instead say #NeverGoFullMcIntosh.

But it is precisely because of this intense emotional impulsiveness that leftists like him would become a perfect target for a leaked video. Why? Just imagine a drunk, emotionally wounded and vindictive Jonathan Mcintosh on video, spilling all the beans on how he planned the hoax for the FemFreq Kickstarter. That? That would be a golden dream. Such a video would be a Schadenfreude wet dream…

Sadly, you cannot have everything in life.

(However, plenty of people read this site, who knows? Maybe someone could ambush them and release the video or even propose a better idea in the comment section.)

 

 

 

 

header 4

Proper manipulation

 

But even if that Troll’s wet dream ever came to fruition, it would only be a band-aid on the dam, because Anita is just one of many copies of herself. Those “copies” are other less known feminists who are just as hypocritical and will replace her as soon as she is forced into shameful retirement.

However, those other “Anitas” will have the same ideology and similar weaknesses, thus, what is needed is a longer lasting set of solutions. What is needed instead of wet dreams of viral videos is more down-to-earth plans that can be done within #GamerGate. Let me put it this way, imagine Anita was the Vatican. Clearly while we cannot get rid of it at once, but we can expose their corruption and damage their credibility through proper manipulation. We could even play a 3 stage game; first toying with their weaknesses then exposing them, roughly speaking all taunt campaigns would have the following sections:

  • #Wound their Ego
  • #Taunt Them
  • #Expose Them

As previously noted, when SJWs are properly manipulated, they get angry and go out of character, and THEN they show their true colors. Just like it happened with Robert-Zoey Tur blatantly threatening to physically assault Ben Shapiro on live TV.

But what do I mean by proper manipulation? In a nutshell, you intentionally make your targets upset in order to document and #Expose their hate.  Then their #Exposed and publicized hate will erode their credibility. You need to verbally punch first.

As previously stated, there is one caveat: You must refrain from getting upset. I cannot stress this enough:

Your enemy’s anger and ego are their burden. 

But If you want to win, cut all ties to your anger and ego. They are a burden.

 

I can confidently tell you that you cannot defeat them if your emotions control you. Before you manipulate them you need to become the master and commander of your emotions. Or, in other words,

troll_autoquote

Yes. I just quoted myself. Yes, 100% Troll narcissism.

 

Intense emotions are a handle that allows retards to be carried like doggy shit bags. The stronger the emotion, the bigger the handle. And just like bags of dog shit someone has been leaving on your yard, you want to grab them by the handle and dump all of their shit on their own yard. You want to publicly force them to own their shit.

But what if you make the mistake of getting upset? Then you will feel a sudden itch on top of your head, then some redness and a sudden burst of stupidity will sprout out from your temples, and then you will grow a handle to allow anybody with more emotional discipline than yourself to carry you. Once you become a shithead, they will take you for a ride. You’ll become this:

dogshit

 

Logically, instead of becoming a doggy shit bag, you want to develop the emotional discipline to control yourself and learn how to manipulate your lefty SJW enemies. You want to taunt them like Shapiro did. But you want to be better prepared than Shapiro and avoid choking on your words.

Had Ben Shapiro’s encounter with Robert-Zoey Tur not been recorded, the left would have avoided all accountability because it is in their nature to avoid owning their shit. They are hypocrites and cowards, hence why you must #Expose them in an organized fashion.

Remember: You need to taunt them on social media until they grow handles from their retarded heads. Once their impulsive emotions have turned them into doggy shit bags, THEN IT IS YOU the one that can take a whole lot of them and:

 

TAKE THEM ALL FOR A RIDE

 

This is the end of part 2.

On part 3 of this #TrollSchool INTRO series we will analyze the Queen of Trolls himself: Milo Yiannopoulos

Find out how to butthurt feminists like Nero on part 3.

Thank you for reading.

3-720X340-cover-dimensions-HOW-TO-UPSET-THE-LEFT

End of part 2

 

#UpsetAllAnitas: How to Upset the Left (INTRO) 1 of 3

DISCLAIMER 1: What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2: I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status. For those who stayed, read on;

(This article was featured at theralphretort.com)

TROLL_ACCOUNTABILITY_2

#UpsetAllAnitas: How to Upset the Left (INTRO)

Part 1 of 3

rt1         Part2       Part3

header 1

Anita Sarkeesian is one of the many leftists, feminists and SJWs who have a common shared “progressive” goal. They want to force you and everyone else to convert to their religion:

Feminism

 

How? Easy.

They want you to join them in their leftist religious groupthink based on the following mantra:

Anita-listen-and-believe 1080

“Listen and believe”

 

Yes, “listen and believe,”- The same demand religions expect of their “sheep-like” followers.  These sheep have to think the same way and exercise the same benevolent suspension of reasoning for their religion to “feel” real. But if anybody disagrees? That is feminist heresy.

See, Anita’s cultish request is as subtle as a pink pinless grenade lobbed from the lands of feminism, AKA the vast undeclared pink religion.

Of course, not a single one of her followers will admit they belong to the Sarkeesian cult.

Of course not, Anita and her acolytes will verbally deny that they are a religion, but they will confirm it with their behavior and their blatantly religious demand:

“Listen and believe”

Their public actions are vulgar displays of dogma thinly coated with media designed pass off as “pop culture criticism.”- And just like a religion, feminism has a dysfunctional relationship with that abusive brute who non-consensually penetrates its tenets and ideas with that long, throbbing and blunt object called “Reality” (all while feminism has to bite the pillow and bleed in silence).

No. I don’t give “rape trigger warnings.”

 

No. I do not give a particular fuck if a feminist gets “triggered” by mere text either.

However, what would Anita do with the above sentence if she were given absolute power?

Simple. If Anita had limitless power, she would erase not only the rape metaphor above but this article in its entirety. She would also do the same with the rest of the Internet.

Just like a religion, feminism would subject the whole internet to: 

MASS CENSORSHIP OF IDEAS.

That, in and of itself, is another problem with feminism; feminists like Anita have a dysfunctional relationship with language, metaphors and sexuality. That’s why they want to limit and censor all of the above.

Censoring sexuality in games? That is just the beginning.

The next step will be the internet, then all porn. Like most religions, they want to regulate and limit your ideas and your sexuality. Also like most religions, the Sarkeesian Cult should be dismantled. They are the enemy of sexuality, free speech and freedom of thought.

 

header 2

Logically, the first thing before defeating an enemy is finding out what their weaknesses are, and in the case of Anita’s political side, their main weakness are:

  • Their inflated egos.
  • Their grotesque dependence on their intense emotions
  • Their impulsiveness

See, feminists, SJWs and leftists usually operate on raw emotion, not reason. That makes some of their behavior predictable, not quite an Achilles heel but close enough if they are properly manipulated. But this yields an even more important question: If their egos and anger are their weaknesses, what weapon do they use attack others?

Simple. Their main weapon is to play the victim.

Thus taking away their main weapon leaves them open for an attack but then the following giant obstacle presents itself:

if you attack them, you give them their weapon back. Then they play the victim again.

See the paradox?

How do you defeat an enemy you cannot attack?

See, the solution to this puzzle is to take away their weapon, THEN ridicule them and wear their emotions down until they lose control and become the bad guy or just quit. The solution is attrition, not attack. Or as Master Sun Tzu put it,

master― Sun Tzu

Would you like to see it in practice? Well during a debate on Dr. Drew’s show, journalist Ben Shapiro did the following to transgender Robert-Zoey Tur:

  1. Intentionally stated scientific facts
  2. Took away Tur’s “play the victim” weapon
  3. Made the SJW lose control and exposed Robert-Zoey Tur’s violent & hypocritical nature.

Since SJWs have the bad habit of claiming their comments are taken “out of context” here is the whole context. Just in case you were curious:

Once again, behold the leftist hypocrisy in all its religious glory:

THE PEACEFUL LEFT ZOEY TUR

See? Here is the contradiction, as you can see at the end of the video, even before Robert-Zoey Tur started his hormone replacement treatment he was a lousy, bitter and violent person by his own admission. See, the inconvenient truth is that a sex change is not a magic solution for their often poor pre-existing mental health; often the need for a sex change masks a glorified mental illness and does not improve their suicide rates much.

DISCLAIMER:

Rotten apples like the impulsive, mentally ill Robert-Zoey Tur give a bad name to the trans community and to the many otherwise decent, mentally balanced and rational transpeople there are.

Because of psychos like Zoey Tur, decent transpeople are often painted with the same broad brush, I am talking about decent people like these,

photjenn  @PhotoJennBo

 

hidden tara@HiddenTara

 

thyeryn

@TherynMeyer

The people above have consistently demonstrated their will to distance themselves from the cancer of feminism by exercising their right to think by themselves. I may not agree with every single thing they say but I do respect them for their undeniable critical thinking. Also, notice I referred to them by their female names and the reason is simple: They have earned that courtesy. But psychos like Robert-Zoey Tur? They do not deserve that courtesy at all.

The remarkable transfemales I listed above are only 3 of the many decent rational transpeople there are. Do not let psycho rotten apples like Robert-Zoey Tur smear these kind, valuable and rational transpeople.

But again, impulsive, mentally ill transexuals like Robert-Zoey Tur are examples of the leftist Neo-nuns for “equality.” They are bastions for hypocrisy instead of equality. These leftist nuns have a violent and vicious nature behind their facade of kind and harmless equality.

Granted, that applies to leftist murderous trannies like Tur, but how vicious does the nature of actual female leftists get? Simple. It is much worse because unlike Tur, feminists will not get their hands dirty, they will send their male white knights to do far more damage than a simple beating.

What makes female feminists much worse than a violent tranny from hell like Tur is that feminists have near zero legal accountability and zero boundaries when it comes to inflicting violence by their white knight proxies.

But going back to Shapiro, just like Tzun Zu stated, Shapiro partially exercised the supreme art of war and subdued the enemy without fighting. The enemy (Zoey Tur) was successfully manipulated into exposing themselves thus showing their true violent colors. Make no mistake, Ben Shapiro successfully manipulated Robert-Zoey Tur simply by asking this:

“What are your genetics, sir?”

Notice the “sir” was what triggered Tur and allegedly authorized him to retaliate with physical violence. See? Pure Leftist hypocrisy. The more outraged you are the most justified you are to commit physical assault. Despite all this, Shapiro’s efforts were not a complete success and Ben only partially managed to win the battle. Why? Because he made the mistake of being taken by surprise by Tur’s sudden threat of physical assault and he only managed to barely mumble the following lame comment:

“Well… that seems mildly inappropriate for political discussion?”

Shapiro also made the mistake of not publicly pointing out how easily the “virtuous” and “peaceful” left resorts to assault and how the panelists immediately bend over backwards to justify physical assault. He should have confronted them and asked why their anger justified violence, he should have made them eat their words ON THE SPOT.

Granted, there is a chance he was playing the part but my money is on the chance Shapiro was truly surprised by the sudden threat of physical assault and choked a little mentally, which is surprising because Shapiro is usually one of the sharpest Jews in the market of ideas. But that day? His performance was almost lackluster. (Most likely it was the bacon he had for breakfast that morning; he needs to start buying better Kosher bacon and a decent brand of coffee. Stingy Jews…)

What really saved Shapiro’s performance was that everything was recorded as a perfect example of the sheer and unalloyed hypocrisy of the left. The same left that falsely advocates for “peace” is the one that blatantly threatens those who do not subscribe to their religious tenets.

As expected in the dystopian world we live in, after the threat of assault, nearly all of the panelists started to blame Shapiro for “provoking” Robert-Zoey Tur.

TRANSLATION: “You were asking for the beat up Ben. Next time don’t be so offensive.”

That tactic the panelists used is called DARVO (Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender). Again, just like the Vatican does, feminism immediately resorts to DARVO when exposed.

DARVO

All this drama took place just because Shapiro stated biological scientific facts. See? Feminism even imitates religions to near perfection with the classic opposition to scientific facts. Biological facts are poison to leftists like Robert-Zoey Tur just the way evolutionary facts are poison to Creationists. As Shapiro demonstrated, the best thing you can do is take away their victimhood and taunt them until they expose themselves.

This is the end of part 1 and believe me, from here on, things only get more offensive for feminists.

On part 2 of this #TrollSchool INTRO series we will learn how #Taunt and properly manipulate feminists. 

Find out how to take feminists for a ride on part 2.

Thank you for reading.

2-720X340-cover-dimensions-HOW-TO-UPSET-THE-LEFT

End of part 1

Porn is War on Women, Part 3 of 3

DISCLAIMER 1: What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2: I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status. For those who stayed, read on;

(EDITOR’S NOTE: Feel free to checkout Jack’s site)

Porn is War on Women, Part 3

 

Part1     Part2      Part3

Welcome to the 3rd and final part of the “Porn is War on Women” series. As you may remember, on part 1 we compared feminism to the Westboro Baptist Church as well as elaborated on the implication that feminists hate porn because it reminds them of their own rape. On part 2 we examined the many varieties of functional porn and the thin kinky line between functional porn and actual paraphilias,  we also elaborated upon the very problematic possibility that contrary to what feminists propose, porn may actually decrease sexual assault rates due to the “Porn-Rape Correlation.” Logically, ugly feminists should not be that obsessed with rape, or, as Natasha Leggero put it:

 

“That’s not funny” is what most feminists would say about Natasha’s joke. Yeah, there is a very good reason why they call feminists “Kill-joys”.

See, humor does not count with feminists prudes like Anita Sarkeesian. To them, men are the attackers, the deviants that only want to fuck and rape while preparing to attack by watching violent porn at home. The reality is that feminists like Anita are just hypocrites that like to claim all men are rapists for effect. They say that only to manipulate their followers and extract money from them. If all men were rapists we would have more prisons than Walmarts.

Contrary to Anita’s lucrative narrative,  most men are not rapists, instead it is very likely that only a very small minority of males and females are the ones who assault most victims. That small minority can be referred as “serial rapists”. Serial rapists work like serial killers. You cannot “teach” the former not to rape nor can you “teach” the latter not to kill. That is where feminists’ toddler-like logic falls apart.

If “teaching away” criminal behavior worked, we would not longer have jails. It is just foolish. Add to that the fact that feminists dial their paranoia all the way to 11 with serial rapists. Then all that paranoia only yields their belief in the mythical “rape culture.” Paranoia words so well that if you also dialed it all the way to 11 with serial killers, it would not take long before we had a “Serial Killer-Culture”

But explaining this logic to feminists is a fool’s errand. Feminists’ belief in rape culture s a matter of faith, not logic. They are so obsessed with rape that all porn looks like rape to them. Add to that most of the rape-obsessed feminists are godawful-boil-in-the-ass-ugly. It is no wonder they complain about everything to desperately fish for the attention they cannot with their horse-like faces.

catcalls_Horsey-Brianna WU

 

Again, jokes and logic just fly over the heads of both feminists and religious people. They cannot be persuaded. If confronted with logical arguments, radfems will cover their ears and yell over and over:

“No! Porn is porn!”

Just the way members of the Westboro Baptist Church would cover their ears and yell:

“No! Sin is sin!”

(Ironically, WBC members also consider porn veeeery sinful. Perhaps they should consider merging with their radfem sisters now that Freddy Phelps has long kicked the bucket).

However, the definition of “sin” is incredibly broad and includes perfectly lawful acts (even worse, it also includes thoughts) here is where the definition of “porn” mimics “sin” because it is such a broad definition that it even attempts to ban both perfectly legal acts and thoughts related to porn. And just like you do in front of religious people, “thou shall not speak/think of porn” in front of feminists.

The second problem is that, unlike lawful acts versus purported “sins”, porn is easily placed in a shameful often “indefensible” category based on morals. The phrase “too much porn on your computer” is often used for social shaming, despite the fact that “too much porn” is in and of itself a blurry definition.

Possibly as long as you can work and function in society, you can watch as much porn as you want. Yes, as kinky as it sounds. In my case, I watch around an hour of porn per day and much more on weekends and I am proud to admit to that.

But this yields a far more interesting question: How many times a day do we think of porn? How many of us are willing to admit to that number publicly? 

How about religious people themselves?

Do they think of sin too much?

How much is “too much temptation”?

How about feminists themselves?

Do they think of porn too much?

How much is “too much porn temptation”?

 

See? People with broken, repressed sexualities have a hard time admitting to their temptations, you know why? Because:

 

“Temptation” means there is closeted sexual desire.

 

How many religious people who claim to reject porn but secretly watch it, jerk off to it and then end up feeling “dirty” and guilty? Even better: How many feminists who claim to reject porn but secretly watch it, jerk off to it and then end up feeling “dirty” and guilty?

See, religious people watch porn. Feminists watch porn. Most people watch porn. They just do not admit to it. Men over report and brag, women under-report and play coy. Look, even Iran, the prudish theocracy has some rather unusual searches according to PornMd, after all why would you search for male performers if you are 100% straight? Coincidence? MAybe Iranian women are the ones addicted to porn? Hard to say:

iran

 

 

 

Even the most religious people in Iran might be secretly watching  their deliciously sinful hard-core gay porn at this very moment. But depending on the morals of the culture, demagogues may attempt to make all porn look as bad as illegal porn. Which brings up an interesting question: What is illegal porn?

Illegal porn is not what feminists or religious people are quick to decry as “sinful”. No. We are talking about the forms of porn that are authentically illegal and detrimental to humankind.

FORMS OF ILLEGAL PORN

 

Again, this list elaborates upon the forms of porn that are illegal. Not what feminists want to make illegal, which would be all of the currently legal porn. The list of authentically illegal porn ranks the following way:

1. Child porn
2. Rape/Snuff porn
3. Bestiality porn

NOTE ON CHILD PORN: Even though leftists and websites like Salon.com have recently tried to shamelessly normalize pedophilia via the argument “Virtuous pedophile” pedophilia itself is a completely indefensible argument. Pedophilia destroys the future of a human being and normalizing it will only lead to more child porn.

NOTE ON RAPE/SNUFF PORN: The second one features authentic acts of executions and rape. However, when it comes to public executions or gore due to events like road accidents nearly nothing can be done legally because recording gory images is not illegal (unless the family of the diseased sues). What is entirely illegal and should be punished with life imprisonment or  the death penalty is the cases of snuff film featuring authentic private executions. The most difficult one to discern is the last one, rape porn. The reason for this difficulty is that actors and actresses can portray acts of rape that are indistinguishable from an authentic rape and unless the person presses charges, we cannot know if it was authentic. However, there are limits to the levels of body harm an actor/actress can withstand and if the injuries are life threatening then the likelihood of it being an authentic rape are much higher.

NOTE ON BESTIALITY PORN: Even if there are people who actually date and marry their dogs (even if treat them excellently) they still have no case in court because unlike humans, animals have no capability to give consent to sex (however being a female feminist and claiming past “abuse” may allow the twisting of the law to get away with marrying her German shepherd or a smaller dog as it has already happened)

 

THE UNPERSUADABLES

Now despite the fact those 3 are out of the way, feminists will still try to obsessively compare all legal forms of porn to child/rape/snuff porn. Even with the writing on the wall, feminists will still try to label all the legal colorful variants of porn “illegal“. It is not short-sightedness, it is feminists behaving like pig-headed, unpersuadable-regardless-of-all-evidence, willfully ignorant, intellectually disonest, moronic creationists.

A creationist will still say that the earth is only 10,000 years old even if you make them major in archaelogy as much as a feminist will still insist legal porn is a crime even if they have majored in….never mind, women’s studies is glorified theology.

unpersuadables

Both feminists and creationists are unpersuadable.

For the sake of argument, let’s entertain the possibility that 5 porn “stars” are actually raped every year. If these crimes took place, did they file a police report? Here is where the noise starts as the typical anti porn feminist will try to do the following:

  • Bring up colorful excuses for the adult performer was “prevented from taking legal action”
  • Say the crime took place in the third world
  • Do an hypocritical “switcheroo”

What is the hypocritical “switcheroo” you may ask?

Well the “switcheroo” is a tool well-known for demagogues, it consists of telling a victim’s sad moving story (real or imaginary) then the demagogue stresses and theatrically tells the details the victim’s suffering, their struggle, their pain and once the audience is moved and engaged (or enraged by the double espresso emotional noise) Their outrage is wide awake & ready to be exploited by using the switcheroo. This is done by making the subtle, fleeting implication the same suffering experienced by the victim ALSO happens to the public the demagogue is speaking to. THEN they are convinced they too are victims then the demagogue convinces them they are the “oppressed” too. Allow me to show you who brought the “switcheroo” tradition into the mainstream:

 

Oppressors!

The “switcheroo” is the art of subtle verbal sleight of hand to manipulate the masses.

See? Our charismatic little buddy Hitler stole the“switcheroo” technique from the religious demagogues. But, in the case of feminists, they just painted their stolen “switcheroo” in bright radical pink. It still is the same thing and has very similar stages. First, feminists start by speaking of the authentic and real hardships female sex workers in the 3rd world have to go through and how they are mistreated and underpaid then, they do the “switcheroo” and now the feminist demagogue claims women in the 1st world are suffering EXACTLY as much as those in the 3rd.

This is a careful form of verbal sleight of hand (instead of just plain lying) by manipulating the audience’s emotions and making them believe porn is a mixture of violent, illegal prostitution combined with rape with zero distinctions between the 1st and the 3rd world.

Again, the oldest form of switcheroo can be found in churches where the charismatic demagogue starts talking about a martyr’s suffering then they do the “switcheroo” aaaaaand, what do you know? All of sudden the demagogue and all the people in the church are victims too! Just like the martyr. (also, at this point is where they pass the basket for you to tithe, a pretty slick business strategy to steal money by guilt-tripping sheep also demonstrated by feminists).

These masters of the art of “switcheroos” play around with the audience to artificially reduce their perception of their own agency (but not their agency as a whole as they can still undertake the task of retribution), to make them feel “oppressed”.
Hitler used similar techniques to those used by feminists and the church. But what Hitler focused on was making the Jews look as the dominant class then portraying the Germans as the “oppressed” ones. He successfully portrayed the Germans as  “Aryan victims” of sorts. It is all about convincing the audience they have no agency, no power to control anything, that they are the ones acted upon. But the Germans were not alone using the switcheroo, look:

dolfie

The Nazi “switcheroo”

poppy

The Roman Catholic “switcheroo”

freeddy

The Westboro Baptist Church “switcheroo”

danny

The Anti-Porn Feminist “switcheroo”

anita

The Commercial Feminist “switcheroo”

Eliza chavez I am a videogame character

The Insane Feminist anti-GG “switcheroo”

 

 

screenshot325
Sure…

Since the church of feminism uses the same “switcheroos” during their fundraising “masses” we can separate the noise from the facts. They make emotional noise to control people but the fact is that they just lie for profit. Let’s not forget these hypocritical “switcheroo” manoeuvres date back to even before the inquisition, it is therefore, not surprising, demagogues and religion are like pigs and bacon. (Unlike porn and bacon, they are far from being delicious.)

Besides lying, feminists need to push for laws and lobbying to avoid learning any science, which, in and of itself, is also a potential risk, because the prospect of feminists invading science (less likely but they have tried) to co-opt it or, more likely, they just try to bypass Science through their demagogy. Why? Because they want to get all porn banned and are slowly achieving those goals (I am looking at you citizens of the United Orwellian Surveillanced Kingdom). But since feminists can go and fuck themselves let’s get back to the main question,

Is there hard-core porn that is legal but still “harmful”?

If so, what is authentically “harmful” porn?

What scientific criteria outside religious morals can be used to identify authentically harmful porn?

Also, this begs the question: Harmful for whom?

Harmful for a handful of the adult consenting performers or to all of them?

There is no sexual pleasure without struggle. But extended intense pain is unlikely to yield authentic sexual pleasure. This is where this article will go into a different territory, so, please bear with me for a moment. I am gonna ask you to think about the future and how science may want to accurately and scientifically classify the many expressions of human sexuality by studying porn and its performers. But in order for science to do that, we might have to stop looking at the performer’s genitals and instead see if their brains are experiencing more pain than pleasure.

 

 

THE DARK NEURAL AGES

screenshot
The dark ages

Imagine that in the year 2016 we place a couple of performers under an MRI and make them watch their own performances then we see their arousal and pleasure centers in their brains. They would have to be strapped to the machine because the MRI scanning is easily interrupted if the subject moves even a tenth of an inch. (In short, current technology is not ready for serious porn research because the performer’s brain needs to remain static and that is too limiting for sexual intercourse)

 

 

FUTURE PORN RESEARCH

Future porn research
Let’s say we travel to the year 2031 and in the future, a technology comparable to MRI no longer requires you to be immobilized to be scanned and rather you have to wear a rather bulky helmet, (Porn Daft Punk + Porn Teletubbies MRI porn or sorts. Yes told you it would get weirder) then we would ask the performers to have intense rough intercourse (whichever the most controversial is in 15 years) then we would see if their brains would light up with mostly “pleasure” or mostly “pain” or to get the resulting ratio of sexual pleasure: Sexual Pain.
If that form of future porn were to be considered “harmful” for one of the performers their brains would be blinking like Christmas trees with only pain and no pleasure at all. Problem is, in life, there is no pleasure without struggle and authentic human sexual intercourse involves all intensities of both pain and pleasure. So hypothetically speaking, we would go by percentages to declare the porn in question “kosher porn” which would be at least roughly 51% of the time pleasure + no safe word use. Those rules would make the hard-core porn qualify as lawful because the performer enjoyed himself/herself with 51% of the time pleasure. Add to that the fact they did not have to use the safe word plus they got paid handsomely. You can see where this is going right? Opening that can of feminists worms would result in the following “problematic” situation:

Feminists’ Possible impulsive rebuttals to the 51% pleasure rule.

Opposition (feminists)
“Your science is misogynistic! It should be 95% pleasure at the very least!”

Supporters (producers and performers looking to get paid )
“Can we lower it to 10% pleasure? Pay is higher…”

You could not make anybody happy, not now, not in the future, mostly because emotional thinkers are not authentic thinkers, so science would be “misogynistic” and would demand “neurological enthusiastic consent” or some other form of blackmail bullshit to game the system and prevent the science. Like any religion, feminism is an obstacle for the advancement of science.

Science becomes “misogynistic” when it prevents feminists from lying. Let’s just imagine that in the future the same technology used to study the 51% rule was used to analyze the brains of authentic victims of rape. Let’s say the sample is 1,000 brains of authentic rape victims.

Let’s say the data of the 1, 000 victims is cross referenced with data scans from authentic rape victims coming from war-torn countries (most likely African ones, unfortunately) we would then see a pattern of how the brain is affected by sexually induced PTSD regardless of geographical location (it would stand to reason human neurology would have neurological averages)

Let’s say the sample group grows up to 1, 000,000 scans of rape victims. Let’s imagine the technology becomes so accurate to identify real rape from false claims that it starts being used in legal cases. Just imagine the fits feminists will throw to have all evidence dismissed in court thanks to a scientific test that would detect authentic rape and isolate false rape accusations. They would still insist rape culture is “real” and label science as pure “misogyny”

See, to feminists that future technology would be “misogynistic” simply because it would be a reliable lie detection test to prevent false rape claimants (often feminists carrying mattresses around for effect) from using the law for revenge. If that technology were to exist, it is likely feminists may have to learn how to lie better or try have it banned. Just as they do today with porn.

 

 

 

the beauty of rape culture

Back to the present, (and thank you for taking that future detour with me) the constant today and in the future is that be feminists need to lie for effect. Make no mistake, feminists will keep it lying about porn being “a war against women” or all porn being “rape” or even that “rape culture” exists.

This obsession feminists have with “rape” taking place everywhere and all porn allegedly being rape put a giant dent in the myth of “rape culture”.

Why? Well, if rape culture existed wouldn’t snuff/rape porn be considered legal and even “kosher” instead of illegal? Why would a father kill his daughter’s rapists as it has happened so many times from the dawn of time? Rape has been punished with savage beatings and death possibly from the paleolithic. As soon as your mother, wife, sister or daughter told you she had been raped you possibly had dead man walking: The rapist.

But, for the sake of argument let’s indulge in the utopia of feminists and their rape culture myth. If rape culture existed wouldn’t make more sense for fathers whose daughters were raped to obsessively track the rapists down only to stop, give them a pat on the back, smile have a beer with them? Fathers would greet them and thank them for the merry raping of his daughter. They would even hug them, shake their hand and say:

“Oh! Thank you so much for raping my daughter Mr. Rapist!

After all these years I thought I was gonna have to pay to have her raped. Thank you kindly!”

Then, after a few beers both the proud rape-culture father and his daughter’s merry rapists would all hug, rise their beers and offer a boisterous toast:

“TO RAPE!”

Then the father and all of the merry gang-rapists would ride their horses towards the sunset while holding their beers as the “chariots of fire” theme plays in the background, this song:

Just add this Rape Culture Music to your sunset

the beauty of rape culture

Of course, the beer, the song, the hugs and all of that would be customary if the myth of “rape culture” existed. (But if you instead liked banjo music to celebrate the merry raping of your daughter, who am I to judge your music taste?)

 

To be entirely honest, there is a rape culture most feminists do not like to admit: The jail system. If there is a place where rape is almost 100% guaranteed is a male jail. And it would not be too far-fetched to think that radical feminists who hate men also get all wet horny and goopy at the thought of men raping each other. Obviously, not that feminists will ever admit to that. The Gabbana variety? It is as real as the feminist rape culture.

gabbana

 

But the reality of human sexuality is that porn does not encourage rape in functional individuals (the vast majority of us) and the vast majority of human beings do not rape otherwise we would have more jails than Walmarts (or jails would not exist anymore).

We humans, despite all of our flaws, have survived incredible tests and against all religions and dogmas, we have made it to this day because, more than 51% of the time, we were doing something right; we cared for our community and for our population, for each other.
Every population has its criminals and for a society to work, criminals cannot outnumber the functional individuals as much as a society exclusively based on cannibalism will not last. Imagine a past where the first human tribe dictated everyone should try to rape everyone at all times, then people would have sooner or later snapped and the mass revenge killings would have prevented us all from being here today. So if porn does not encourage imaginary wars or imaginary rape what does it do?

 

THE HIGH COST OF RAPE

The energy investment between watching porn and going out and raping someone is exponential. Of course that between the sexual junk food of porn and the purported “act of war of rape” most males are just going to stay home and jerk off. One because they are not criminals and two, well, raping is too much work.

Allow me to enrage all of Jezebel and Tumblr radfems readers with the following statement:

“The problem with rape is not the morals.

Rape is just too much work.”
-Jack Outis

(please quote me to oblivion, hang on, let me get it for you)

 

On one hand, (unfortunate pun) jerking off while watching legal porn involves no crime and almost no energy involved whereas rape is a crime that will land the male in jail for decades and involves so much work. Why work to lose your freedom when you can fap?
However, the feminist religion rhetoric demands logic to be secondary to morality thus males have to prove their “worthiness” by apologizing on behalf of all men. By this “feminist logic” we would have a world where all ethnic groups would apologize for the following stereotypical crimes:

  • all black people apologizing profusely for all the car stereos stolen in the 20th century? (That surely was a “war on stereos”, or “crimes against music”).
  • Asians being required to apologize preemptively before driving and apologize/feel ashamed for all past and future traffic accidents
  • Declaring Pearl Harbor an Asian act of war on driving?
  • Requiring a preemptive apology from all Mexicans living in Mexico for all diarrheas caused by bad burritos in the US?
  • Requiring all Japanese men to apologize for all their weird rapey anime.
  • And so on…

No. None of it makes no sense. There is no need to be ashamed for someone else’s wrongdoing as much as there is no need to feel any shame for the crimes committed by serial killers.

Outrage? Yes.

Shame? No.

Or, in other words:

whedon

IN CONCLUSION

 

How many men are nurtured rapists but not natural-born rapists?

Here is the insult upon the injury: Single mothers provide us with the most criminals in society, including 60% of all convicted rapists along with more than 70% of all inmates single mothers producing more than 70% of all inmates in American prisons statistics and massive literature conclusively show. Yes, it has been proven over and over that the vast majority of inmates in American jails were raised by single mothers.

What a sublime irony when feminists declare porn to be “rape” while feminists+single mothers raise at least 60% of actual rapists in American jails, we can’t imagine a more blatant exercise in hypocrisy than the one performed by feminists.

No. Porn is not war on women. The reality is that feminists are mentally ill human beings with broken sexualies trying to force reality to conform to their delusions. Just the way Creationists do with their arguments against evolution. Feminist ignorance is not a point of view. Facts are universal and shared by everyone. Opinions? They don’t have to be shared.

Or, in other words:

 

Daniel Patrick Moynihan

 

PS: I look forward to the day when feminists raise their hemlock cocktails and offer the following boisterous toast:

FEMINISTS: “TO MY SON, THE RAPIST I CREATED!”

This is the end of part 3.

End of the series “Porn is War on Women Series”.

Thank you for reading.

 

 

The Patriarchy Won! Gregory Alan Elliott Found Not Guilty!

This article was featured at TheRalphretort.com

The Patriarchy Won! Gregory Alan Elliott found not guilty!

 

Great news fellow toxic males of the internet!

I am proud to announce Gregory Alan Elliott has been found: Not guilty.

 

 

The ego of ALL Canadian Feminists was rectally wounded after Mrs Stephanie Guthrie was handed the worst legal beating of her radical life: She lost the case!

This victory marks the beginning of a much better, much more abusive and proudly misogynist internet for all of us privileged males. Today, the Internet is a much better toxic place for us the privileged white cis male pigs.

But let’s not forget this whole feminist drama started all because Torontonian radfem Stephanie Guthrie became enraged after seeing the punch Anita video game at newgrounds.com. Immediately after, she started pink-foaming at her radical mouth and started a campaign to get the programmer of the Anita beat-up game fired!

The programmer in question Ben “Bendilin” Spurr laughed his ass off at the desperate attempts by the pack of rad-bitches to get him fired.

www-hehu

 

But a man with balls of steel appeared on the Twitter stage to butthurt Guthrie: Gregory Allan Elliot (BTW please visit his fund he needs your help)

Elliot, a proud member of the patriarchy, started telling radfem Guthrie to shut the fuck up without using any threats. However, Guthrie managed to convince the Canadian legal system her butthurt feelings represented a legal case. Gregory Alan Elliott was then falsely accused of criminally harassing Stephanie Guthrie (and a second radfem bitch Heather Reilly) over several months in 2012.

But today, that radical and retarded 4 year journey started by a group of anorgasmic radical Torontonian radbitches has come to an end!

Now the patriarchy can go back to work comfortably oppressing women and taking all their rights away!

Also, we can now comfortably go back to punching Anita in the name of the patriarchy!

Be proud! Be toxic! Be male!
Be worse than a radioactive Hitler!

Let’s all hail the Patriarchy!

(Also let’s celebrate with sweet anti-feminist pics in the comments below!)

 

 

be sexy 2016

Proudly brought to you by Ralphretort.com™ and its T. Associates®.

 

 

JackOutisTroll: Liana K Gets Punked by Master Milo Over Gravestanding

DISCLAIMER 1: What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2: I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent  #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status. For those who stayed, behold;

(EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was featured at TheRalphRetort.com)

 

 

This post was written by me:

Neo-Troll Jack Outis.

I am 100% responsible for your offended feelings and that makes me very proud of what I do.

Rest assured, I do not give a particular fuck about your suffering.

Smart people ignore me & you may not be one of them.

AGAIN: Ralph did not write this post. I did.

 

First of all, my condolences to Lillian Feng’s grieving family members: May she rest in peace. Secondly, compliments to Oliver Campbell for saying this about Lillian Feng’s premature death.

 

OLIVER

Why the compliment? Because when someone as young and promising as Lillian Feng passes away, you have to focus on her achievements in life, who she was as a person and why she will be missed THEN you finish the tweet.

That is exactly what Oliver did, he informed the public, then highlighted the fact that Lillian (who used the handle @NotTheLastMaybe) was consistently courageous enough to publicly defend a cause she cared for:

#GamerGate.

Oliver’s tweet was an example of class and masterful tactfulness. He was respectful, he was concise, he was precise.

(unlike him, I have neither class nor tactfulness & I am proud of that freedom)

After Oliver’s tweet, everything should have stopped because the relatives and more specifically Lillian’s grieving boyfriend: physician Ashton Liu (@Ash_effect) had clearly expressed he wanted to grieve alone and in peace by stating this:

OLIVER2

 

VIVIAN’S PINK NARCISSISM

 

Despite all that, this narcissistic SJW idiot opened her self-centered mouth:

cultofvivancover1

 

To be more specific (as she barfs out too much of her idiocy daily) she said this:

vivians narcissism crop

 

Like most feminists, Vivian is well known for hijacking a cause for self promotion, hence why she even hijacked the #GamerGate mascot for her own benefit. Then she co-opted Lillian’s passing to promote her selfie, herself and her stolen brand.

Another writer here noticed Vivian’s blatantly manipulative move and wrote a very direct post about her narcissistic need to co-opt even someone else’s death for self promotion.

 

See, both myself and WildGoose could have easily let this hypocrite slide, but to quote YouTuber Thunderf00t:

 

THUNDERF00T TEMPLATE

Feminism is another religion that relies on playing the victim to extract money from gullible people. And professional parasites like @CultofVivian thrive in their fake victimhood because they think themselves as fashionable parasites free to profit from others THEN play the victim if ever challenged.

This is not new, the vatican has done the same with their pedos and @CultofVivian is not different from those religious hypocrites who support and defend Vatican pedos.

It is for these reasons religious hypocrites and their dishonest ideas should never go unchallenged.

That is exactly why I made the following meme; to highlight @CultofVivian’s hypocrisy and made sure it circulated around on Twitter.

 

vivians narcissism

LIANA K’S 

APPALLING NARCISSISM

 

 

See, the problem with feminist parasites is that they often “smell” there is a vulnerable host nearby and try to attach themselves to it. In this case Vivian was not alone in her mendacity and to be honest, I never expected a feminist hypocrite to sink any lower but I was mistaken as White Trash Queen & FAKE JEW Liana K went as low as a pink cockroach can go and said this;

LIANAS narcissism

Forget about the basic human decency of respecting the privacy of a grieving person. No. According to Liana K’s actions:

You have to make sure you disrespect the grieving relatives DIRECTLY  “preferably” less than a week after Lillian passed away.

But Liana’s hypocrisy is much worse than just that. Much much worse. How bad? Well, in the most disrespectful way possible:

Liana K asked the grieving boyfriend (@Ash_Effect) “permission” to disrespect his dead girlfriend by pretending to cosplay like the white trash whore Liana is & blatantly use Lilly’s death as justification for Liana K’s self narcissistic promotion.

At this point, I decided all bets were off. Why? Allow me to paraphrase what Thunderf00t said:

If dishonest people go unchallenged, they won’t go away. They will proliferate just like religion did. 

Since all bets were off and neither Vivian nor Liana K had the basic decency of respecting the period of grieving Lillian’s relatives were entitled and even dared contact them directly, I decided to also expose Liana K through this similar meme I circulated on Twitter;

LIANAS narcissism

And guess who picked it up and retweeted to his gigantic audience? Guess who decided to fabulously bitchslap Liana K? Yeah, it was Milo: The gay Batman of the Twitters himself the one who tweeted this:

dangerous fag

 

Which roughly translated into this,

fab bitchslapo mini

 

Logically, Liana K got a tsunami of criticism following Milo’s tweet featuring the meme I made to expose her hypocrisy. And at some point in the morning of January 14 2016, thanks to @Nero, @redlianak experienced a Chernobyl-like rectal meltdown. Liana K then expressed her intense emotions unrelated to love towards trolly yours to her minions and erect fanboys. Shortly after, I was awarded my 37th suspension victory & it was worth every stroke. (more on that later)

VIVIAN & LIANA’S DARVO

 

DARVO

But guess what happened? Immediately after you expose a feminist hypocrite through someone with Milo’s clout, you immediately see more and more hypocrites and White Knights come out of the woodwork to help their revered feminist hypocrites.

But the feminist narcissists? Oh, those just love to play their well rehearsed “poor innocent victim” role to blatantly manipulate others which is exactly what Vivan and Liana K did. They immediately said they “never” intended to disrespect and instead were “attacked” for their “good intentions”

Guess what? After they started feeling the heat, both hypocrites intensified their victimhood narrative and neither Vivan nor Liana admitted they had done anything wrong. No. Quite the opposite, they instead claimed they were the ones who had been WRONGED by all the “hateful” people who pointed out their hypocrisy.

Well, that tactic already has a name and it is called DARVO which means the following

 

“The perpetrator or offender may Deny the behavior, Attack the individual doing the confronting, and Reverse the roles of Victim and Offender such that the perpetrator assumes the victim role and turns the true victim into an alleged offender. This occurs, for instance, when an actually guilty perpetrator assumes the role of “falsely accused” and attacks the accuser’s credibility or even blames the accuser of being the perpetrator of a false accusation.”

 

 

Contrary to what feminists believe, the term DARVO was first coined not by “white privileged cis pig males” but by two trained female psychologists. First by Dr Jennifer J. Freyd (PhD of the University of Oregon) then by Dr Tara J. Palmatier a very intelligent woman who happens to be especially reviled by feminists similar to Vivian or Liana K because Dr. Palmatier has consistently stated that it is abusive females (often feminists) the ones who use DARVO in both their private and public lives to hurt people.

Add to that injury the insult that Dr. Palmatier happens to commit the cardinal feminist sin of specializing on offering psychological help almost exclusively to male patients NOT women. I am serious, look:

About

I strongly recommend you visit her site whenever you have time and you follow her posts on facebook, and if you have a male friend who has been the victim of a toxic vindictive and dysfunctional feminist, consider referring them to Dr Palmatier. She is that good.

 

 

 

AFTER LIANAK’S RECTAL MELTDOWN

 

This post will be updated as the drama unfolds because not only Liana K suffered intense rectal discomfort, also plenty of people (her feminist fanboys and fangirls) were vicariously butthurt by Milo’s tweet.

By the way, thank you for getting me suspended Milo, and I am not joking or being ironic, I really want to thank Milo for my most recent suspended account because to this Neo-Troll, every suspension is a victory (37 suspension victories so far) and I happen to have plenty of backups (usually ~18 which I constantly renew once one of my drones is shut down)

Why do I do this? Simple. To show feminists and SJWs their censorship is useless, ineffective & to frustrate them.

I even have the cynical habit of defecating this insult into the narcissistic eyes of my SJW groupies by tweeting this at them every time I activate one of my backups/drones:

Metaphoric_defecation_into_SJW_eyes

Also, allow me to remind you: I am very proud of this “obsessive” habit of mine. Let’s not forget that the difference between “obsession” and “dedication” hinges upon which hypocrite gets offended first.

 

Make sure I am not proud of what you want to shame me for.

 

CONCLUSION

Again, why fight these hypocrites?

Because If dishonest people go unchallenged, they won’t go away. They will instead spread & proliferate just like religion did.

Feminism is a just another religion with far more political power than all of the others, it dictates when and how laws will be passed or created. It is the religion of making the personal political and the political personal, it obeys emotion and stifles science all in the name of the god they worship:

Women.

Even worse, what can be expected from women who are also part of the religion that worships women?

Exactly. Boundless Feminist Narcissism.

Hence why Vivian and Liana K are unalloyed narcissists; they worship a religion that worships their gender and by that definitions they have no flaws and no need to improve: NOTHING IS EVER THEIR FAULT.

Because of all these reasons I only have one standard: Hypocrites have to be exposed. No double standards.

Men? Women?  Trans? I do not give a fuck. I will criticize & expose your hypocrisy.

If I am a hypocrite? Expose me. If you are a hypocrite? You will be exposed. Nobody above the rules.

Quote me on that & get very, very offended.

 

Thank you for reading.

 

PS

Thank you Nero.

PS 2

Thank you Thunderf00t.

 

Liana K: The Glorified Canadian White Trash SJW

DISCLAIMER 1: What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2: I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent #GamerGate. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status. For those who stayed, behold;

(EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was featured at theralphretort.com)

720X340 cover 2.png

-uncensored!!!- FINAL LIANA COVER.png

Liana K: The Glorified Canadian White Trash SJW

 

 

 

 

FABULOUS_SMACK!

The first time I came across social Justice Warrior/ Commercial feminist Liana K was when Milo fabulously and masterfully bitch-slapped her in the image above. The response from Master Milo is as unapologetic and truthful as it gets yet, it still is slightly burdened by Milo’s British elegance. Truth is, Liana K has no talent other than her sad and desperately vulgar display of nudity. It is especially sad now that her fertile value is decreasing extremely fast at the very ripe age of 38. Beyond age 40? Her income is likely to forever cease. Her fertility window is practically gone. Forever.

See, the second problem is that Liana is too unoriginal a hypocrite, there are many other feminists like her, who, narcissistically bet on their fertile value as if it was going to last forever. The result? Plenty of pretty-dumb feminists like Liana put all of their eggs in the bottomless basket of their narcissism. Feminists like Liana K waste their best years while doing their nails or hair;  blatantly foregoing authentic STEM training for years . Until one fateful day, they hit 40 and “don’t know what to do!”. Then they realize they have no qualifications or training and just get dumber, fatter, demoralized and often very, very bitter.

However, unlike other dumb feminists, Liana is infamously remarkable for her thinly veiled double agent antics where she publicly plays both PRO & ANTI #GamerGate roles. Yes. All in the same breath. “Hiding in plain sight” and being given endless concessions just because of her partial nudity. It is nearly comical to observe her do her parlour tricks expecting people not to notice how she tries to “hide in plain sight” as the spectacular hypocrite she is.

At times, her double agent antics make her look almost as if she was a slightly more retarded incarnation of Gawker Media. She blatantly tries to be the spoken SJW-online magazine that condemns and promotes two opposing viewpoints at the same time. Gawker got away with that in writing for a while, but you really have to be a double-espresso feminist retard to try to pull that off in spoken form.

There are talented hypocrites and Liana is not one rather, she is a hypocrite of the supplicant variety with scarce self-awareness. But the kind of double-speak/moving-the-goal-post narrative Liana uses? That is common to feminists like Anita Sarkeesian or Zoe Quinn. The only difference is that Liana K lacks the talent to be a good hypocrite  and use those tactics effectively. But quite honestly, the whole tired feminist narrative is getting almost as old as Liana, so, I thought about not even writing this post on her hypocrisy.

Fortunately, SJW-Commercial Feminists like LianaK are quite prolific at three things:

  • Lying,
  • Playing the victim
  • Making enemies.

Therefore my troll task became much easier; all I had to do was to pose as a feminist with one of my other fake accounts on different social networks…then do a little trash-talking about Liana K, then some prodding here and there until “someone” who, I will not specify, but might have been an ex co-worker/friend/fan/classmate anonymously volunteered some information on Liana’s past to get back at her and debunk her numerous lies. And holy fuck, does she ever lie.

But, before we start with Liana K’s broken & dysfunctional childhood, allow me to preemptively debunk a few of her bitching points:

1. “You are judging me by my sexual value!”
Yes. It is your fault LianaK.
If you do not want to be graded on your fertility, stop displaying it for personal gain. Or, in other words, if you do not want to be judged as a whore, stop wearing the uniform.
2. “You wrote a hit piece on me!”
No Liana. I only reported on your pathological lying and spectacular stupidity. But if any of the information on this article is inaccurate, feel free to get offended and contact your numerous enemies to find out which one(s) gave me the info. Good fucking luck, you got a long list to go through dear white trash queen.
3. “You are attacking my husband!”
 No. I am just stating how much of a failure he is to the otherwise very successful Jewish people. His biggest failure was marrying you, fake Jew Lianna K.
4. “You are attacking me!”
You were going to get offended anyway.

LITTLE LIANA’S BROKEN CHILDHOOD

little_broken_princess

Goy LianaK and sister (photo from last century)

Let’s get this out of the way: Liana K comes from a very broken, severely dysfunctional white trash home and her mother and father were never Jewish.

The inconvenient truth is that Liana K’s parents were garden variety, dysfunctional “working class” Canadian white trash. Nothing more. Again, Liana is lying if she claims she was born Jewish. Yes, just in case it was not clear: Liana K was born white trash and will always be.

Now that we cleared that, here’s a little bit more on Liana K’s white trash origin’s: Very early in life, Liana K’s broken parents took her and her sister to Knoxville, Tennessee then, when the relationship got more defective, they moved to Athens, Ohio and finally, when their white trash-ness hit the fan, Liana’s parents split.

This break-up was neither silent, nor peaceful. Quite the opposite, their separation was extremely noisy and with plenty of “dysfunctional fireworks” for the two girls and their neighbors to hear and see at night. Of course, this is only metaphorically speaking. It would be outrageous to claim her parents used to beat each other in front of the girls at night to the point of waking up the neighbors and them calling the police.

Of course, only the lowest of the white trash would fight in front of their children or sadistically dress them like this to add trailer-park insult upon their genetic white trash injuries.

yeah_suuuper_jew_kids

Suuuper goy…fake Jew girls

(Side Note: No, despite the similarities, what the girl is carrying is not their brother, it is just an ET the extraterrestrial toy from the last century.  Yes, the white trash girls in the photo are quite deformed due to the harshness of Canadian winters and the resulting inbreeding but the smallest, almost identical creature is fortunately not alive.)

Take this with a grain of salt (like everything my contact said) but the alleged reason the mother left the father was a fair amount of domestic violence where the mother was the more dysfunctional of the two. I am talking about this lady:

whitetrash-momLiana’s trashy mom back then and last December.

 

Then, Liana K’s mentally broken & trashy mother took both girls to Toronto, Ontario. Initially they stayed with relatives, but when the family could not take Liana’s mother and her broken behavior anymore, they were soft-evicted and had to move elsewhere. To be more specific, they moved to the 3rd-world-slum multicultural-slum Jane and Finch in Ontario, where the lowest rents could be found at the end of last century.

As it is typical with single mothers, Liana K’s mother consistently struggled to earn barely enough money raise them and for at least the first 10 years of her life, Liana barely knew what living above poverty level meant.

It was in these years that Liana’s mother made it clear to her she was more of a “obstacle” than a daughter and even to this day, Liana “fondly” remembers she was a burden to her own mother. Here it is, in Liana’s own words:

I frequently felt like a burden to my mother. That’s a bad thing a kid should never have to feel.

My contact also claimed that it was during these early years that Liana was allegedly molested by a relative but the mother never pressed charges so the severity of the molestation is to this day still unknown.

Whether or not LianaK was truly molested, the fact is these first 10 dysfunctional years of her life did not just “scar” Liana, they defined her. She will forever be dysfunctional herself. Liana K is damaged goods.

Deep down, Liana K is painfully aware of her own dysfunction and has confessed to a few trusted people she has not had children (and at 38 most likely never will) because she is too broken to be a good mother. Or in her own euphemistic words;

A big reason I don’t have kids yet is that I never want them to feel like a burden.

See? Even more broken than her mother.

As the years passed Liana K’s dysfunction got worse, and with her latent daddy issues (daddy was never there when she needed him), she grew up fat, unattractive and by all intents and purposes, she presented the textbook features of what single broken mothers tend to produce in Ontario/ North America: Broken offspring.

Or what? Solid people are always expected from broken parents?

Only feminists like Liana K would venture into barfing that kind of nonsense publicly for feminist brownie points or to fatten her Patreon. Why? Because her own life is the refutation of a functional household.

This lazy, low-expectation upbringing resulted in an overweight partial adult that aimed for the lowest challenge possible while yearning for a second “better” childhood, even if it meant being a mediocre feminist Peter Pan. First, Liana went for one of the most mediocre degrees in humanities: English. Besides the useless degree, being as fat as a standing ginger pink pig did not help young Liana K. (See fig. 1 The curse of the Ginger Pig.)

broken and early

Fig. 1 The curse of the Ginger Pig (standing).

To top it off, Liana K’s pre-existing inherited mental health issues just fossilized once she embraced feminism in college. Nothing better to fuck you up for life than a religion that tells you nothing is ever your fault and predisposes you to lifelong mediocrity:

Feminism.

After finishing her mediocre attempt at a degree at York University, Liana K finally embraced her Peter Pan wet-dream…with cosplaying.

Oh, wait, that was last century, back when Liana K was not as overweight and middle-aged. Back then, cosplay was a rather odd endeavour  not like today’s fashionable way to wear your mental illness in public erm…not like today’s convention-only widespread “hobby”.

No, last century when Liana K was not as ripe as an early grandma, people would not cosplay, other than on Halloween or whenever they managed to escape while still wearing their ass-crack-displaying gowns and/or were off-meds. (No. Proper modern cosplay ass-cracking displays involve spandex & body paint along the same lack of meds at the very least.)

This presented a serious problem for Liana K. How could a mediocre broken partial adult with the mind of a broken child and the body of a fat adult woman carry out her mediocre dream of a 2nd childhood? Where could a broken adult woman dress up as a Halloween weirdo on a semi-daily basis without too much backlash or an immediate padded cell?

Exactly. Liana had to become a Stripper.

But there was a “minor”  problem: finishing school left LianaK in deep student debt. However, her “main” problem was not the debt, her main problem was that she was fat.

How fat? So fat that she would have to have been the one paying men to endure the torture of seeing her strip. Yes, she looked like this after graduation:

 fat_grad

According to my contact, after Liana K managed to successfully shed the extra weight and started stripping for a living at the BrassRail strip joint and a few other questionable venues in downtown Toronto. During this stripper period of LianaK’s life three things happened:

  1. Mild Eating Disorders
  2. Two Miscarriages
  3. More Debt

Now, here is where information became scarce and my contact refused to specify whether or not Liana K became barren after one of the alleged miscarriages. If those two claims were to be true, it would make sense for a feminist like Liana K to become even more mentally ill and embrace radical feminism out of daily resentment towards the very men she depended on to derive an income, song after song through her daily subset of prostitution: Stripping.

But that does not answer the 3rd point. Why more debt? Did Liana K become depressed and sought shelter in drugs? Shopping? Did LianaK forget to pay her student loan? Did Liana K dabble in escorting AKA apocryphally “fashionable” prostitution?

I had so many questions for my already angry contact (which would have been a normal state for an alleged feminist) I noticed more swearing in the messages and a much faster pace. I then decided to move along instead of risking a premature rage-quit on her/his behalf, so I changed the topic and asked this question:

So, how did she [LianaK] get out of the hole?

My contact then responded:

She [LianaK] auditioned for the TV show and got lucky…

Exactly. LianaK the stripper bagged a job and a producer Jew husband in one shot.

How else could a talentless parasite like LianaK get out of the hole she was in? If that were true, it certainly made sense.

But who was the retard Jew dumb enough to acquire the all of the outstanding debt accrued by a mentally broken woman like Liana K?

This poor dumb fuck. 

rip off

Now you see where the Jewish last  name TRULY came from?

How sexually desperate do actually have to be to fuck a standing ginger pig such as Liana K? An average drunk dude looking for a quick skank to shag I can understand, but an educated Jew? Shame on you Steven Joel Kerzner!

LIANA K: THE FAKE JEW LIAR

 

GOY LITTLE LIAR

Long story short, Liana K was desperately looking for a job by the time they were auditioning strippers for the late night white trash “Ed the Sock” ripoff mascot TV show. Liana K got hired, exchanged sexual favors to advance her career (I am looking at your 5 swollen orifices Zoe Quinn), then the Jewish-retard Steven Joel Kerzner fell for the trap hook line and sinker and acquired the whole Liana K debt.

Yeah, he married her not only as a financial beast of burden, but also as an unpaid, full-time, mental therapist for broken white trash queen Liana K. Now you know where Kerzner’s last name came from. Liana K married a Jew but she was herself born to a pure white trash family. LianaK was never born Jew. Therefore Liana K’s claim of her perfectly “knowing what antisemitism is like” is pure bullshit and false virtue signaling just like the fake-black Rachel Dolezal but in a fake-Jew form (skip to minute 2:38 and again at 4:55 where she blatantly lies about being a Jew) Just like Rachel Dolezal, all Liana K is doing is BLATANTLY LYING for leftist brownie points.

Stop lying LianaK because you were NEVER born Jew, you lying goy white trash-born fraud.

To top it off, Liana K is so lazy and dumb that on the video above, she did not even bother to research the difference between branches of Islam, Sunni vs Shia, and the distribution of Islam branches with the Kurdish people at minute 5:45. Again, she is a fat, lazy, ginger, pig parasite and has the tendency of being lazy both physically and intellectually. It is in LianaK’s deeply lazy nature to lie and just wing it instead of studying.

Going back to Steven Joel Kerzner, despite being a Jew, this poor fuck is living proof that even smart tribes like the Jews have their retards. As a tribe, you don’t get to have 27% of Nobel Prizes without having a few penis-minded retards like Steven Joel Kerzner.

Most likely, Steven Joel Kerzner’s direct ancestors were the mentally ill Jews fucking the sheep, not the ones doing the numbers and memorizing mathematical letters. At least Steven Joel Kerzner has somehow leveled-up his lineage and no longer resorts to sheep-fucking and instead he married a standing female ginger pig. Oh wait..fuck! The curse of the ginger pig is not Kosher at all…

Well, you gotta give it to the Jews, they reeeeeally do not fuck around when it comes to being traditionally discriminatory via bloodlines. In short: if your mom was not Jew by birth, you WILL NEVER be considered a real Jew.

No.

To be a real Jew, your mother has to be Jewish by birth.

So since, Liana is only a fake jew, all she might ever produce is fake little goy children. But since she is 38, at best all she could produce at this point is little retarded down-syndrome-ridden-fake-Jew-goy-children indistinguishable from any Nashville residents (NOTE by TheRalph: Fuck Nashville. M-town for life). Liana’s children would instead be the 2nd biggest disgrace to Canada. Hope that she sticks to cats and never reproduces. Well, one can only hope and be optimistic. After all, it is only 2 years left before her goopy white trash factory closes forever.

Sucks to be you middle-aged LianaK-the-goy-white-trash-queen-standing-pig. 

But, again, why would a respectable Jew marry the lowest of the low of Canadian white trash (yes, as appalling as it sounds, given to the fact it produced LianaK, Ontario is even worse than White Trash Inbred-Mecca: Nashville TN) Marrying a standing ginger pig like Liana K was a gigantic disservice to the very people who survived the forced Jew-gypsy nomadic life, then the hard-core German rave sauna-dance and the resulting curse of the ashtrays.

After all that struggle, this stupid ungrateful retard-Jew named Steven Joel Kerzner marries this goy-as-fuck white trash, parasitical skank called LianaK, only to have what? Fake Jew babies?

What a disgrace to the people of Israel.

What is wrong with you Steven Joel Kerzner? Couldn’t you have been a proper modern Jew and gone to the motherland to purchase a distant relative or a just a cousin through a proper dowry? It’s not like CTV never paid you a single CAD for all those years.

Worst thing that could have happened was they would have asked for a few mohar shekels, but no, you had to go fuck the ginger pig, you idiot, white trash, ginger pig fucker. You’re a curse upon all other Jews you pig-fucker Steven Joel Kerzner!

THE ONE-TRICK JEW PONY HUSBAND

 

But who is Steven Joel Kerzner anyway? Besides being a retard, he also is a one-trick pony Jew whose sole claim to fame is this blatant imitation of another far more successful character. This lame attempt at humor is supposed to be an anthropomorphic talking-sock named “ED”.
Does it look familiar to you? Let me put it succinctly:
failure sock
On one hand we have “Ed the Sock”, the opposite of triumph. Why? Because as a “funny” character, it truly is a failure. Steven Joel Kerzner has been milking his sole cash-cow cum-sock since the 90’s. Why? Because he voices it and scripts it. Other than that, he does not have much more to offer. Let that sink in. For over 20 years, this “comedian” retarded-Jew has only produced one successful character (and thankfully zero retarded-goy-children with his ginger pig-standing fake Jew wife: LianaK).
triumph-dog
On the other hand, we have the internationally known and successful Conan O’Brien troll-dog: Triumph.
See, Triumph the insult dog was created by a far wealthier & much more successful (as well as talented) Jew: Robert Smigel (who also does the voice and scripting of Triumph the Insult Comic Dog)
What is interesting is the lack of lawsuits despite the striking similarities between the two characters. If these two Jews have an agreement of sorts, one of them clearly got the short end of the Canadian stick.
Why? Because as soon as white trash queen Liana K started to mess with her retarded husband’s show, she was declared the “main attraction”. Her job was to interact with her husband’s lame cum-sock, like this;
TH-Ed
Feminism poisons everything,
including your 14 years at CTV Steven.
Then guess what? Just like what happened to Atheism or the tech industry: When a feminist gets involved, it doesn’t take that long before people start losing their jobs.
See, a wife and a husband should never mix marriage and business because they never agree on who should get fired. But this cardinal rule did not matter to Steven Joel Kerzner. He did exactly the opposite and let his red-headed-sow-wife Liana K slowly burn the ship down with daily feminist demands of the already exhausted staff that irreparably derailed the show all the way to its cancellation. Here is a sample of LianaK’s demands in her own SJW words:
One of my biggest victories was the mandate that the dancers and girls in the hot tub must be allowed to speak. Not just when it was convenient, but when they had something to say. There was a live microphone with the floor director that was run over to the ladies if they wanted to interject. It was important to me that these women were characters and not window dressing.
Sure, let’s give dumb people a voice based on their gender or skin color even if they were never qualified or even hired to do so. Why?
Because “equality” and because you are “privileged”.  
Wew…Liana K quote was pure “progressive stack”. What is a Progressive Stack? Let this 2 minute vid explain it for you. Just watch at 1:17 when someone asks a highly & SUUUUPER  “problematic” question:

@ 1:17 -> Isn’t this supposed to be an egalitarian movement?
Boom.
Pure confusion among the hipsters.
Look at their faces. Invisible cockroaches are crawling up their ass cracks and they can’t even move.
One logical question. That is all it took for their jenga-like postmodernist reality to collapse. Wew…Logic sure is an invisible patriarchal penis that just raped their hipster feelings in one single swift nonconsensual thrust. So swift there was not even time for lube.
With this kind of one-liner surpise butsecs /rational raping, no wonder why feminists and hipsters think so little. They would rape themselves with reason and logic every day and their feelz would only prolapse on Fridays.
Just like Liana K, these meek group-thinker hipsters knew what to demand but didn’t even know what to say when the chips of logic were down. The main difference is that the hipsters fucked their own movement and Liana sunk her husband’s ship.
But did LianaK really get any worse? Did she really become a nightmare to work with? Did she really go that far? Did she really become a feminist thought-police on set?
Of course she did! Again, in her own words this is how she micromanaged the fuck out of her husband’s business until it sank, here she is;
There were a lot of times, looking back, where I won the battle and lost the war.
Fighting to make sure that the black dancer isn’t constantly shoved in the back just because she was tall.
Making sure that the Pakistani woman in the hot tub wasn’t treated differently because she was naturally more curvy.
Constantly watching that the girls in the hot tub could feel free to flash their breasts but not feel pressured to do it either…
I’m sure you can imagine that I wasn’t winning any popularity contests because I was constantly the bad cop. But that’s what sex-positive feminism is.
Just read in between the lines. Liana K’s intense regret stems from no longer being able to micromanage people with her sex-positive religion but not for being a pain to work with. She was completely OK with being  a micromanager/feminist thought police officer on set. Why? Because that is what sex-positive feminism is all about: Fucking up someone else’s relationships and business because of your giant feminist chip on your shoulder. Right LianaK?
I wonder who gave her that SJW micromanager position she was never qualified for?
Oh, that’s right: It was Mr Nepotism.
What an elusive word for those like Liana K and her failure of a husband.
See? When the wife makes decisions but faces no accountability, it is the husband the one that either fires people or gets fired himself.

THE LIANA K PARASITE

tiger-shark

Granted, fat Liana K does resemble a standing ginger pig, but her nature? Nah, that one is different, she truly is a parasite. Just like those little fish that attach themselves to a shark for a free ride and free lunch, Liana K attaches herself to a husband, a company, a movement, or a cause…all in order to get a free ride.

But Liana is far worse than a little remora fish. She is more like a leech that will drain resources from the host and get as many casualties as needed for the sake of her personal gain.

Let’s just start with minor things; for example, the fact that, unlike her husband, she does not always publicly acknowledge she is married. Almost as if she wanted to give the impression she is still single on social media.

The inconvenient truth is that the reason for LianaK’s “I am single” virtue signaling on social media is mostly about business. See, LianaK has a lot of almost legally blind, sexually desperate fanboys that compulsively jerk off at anything that looks or sounds like Rebecca Watson.

So it makes sense that for mere marketing purposes LianaK would avoid mentioning the man she owes everything to. The man who is her own personal patriarchy, the one that always gets her out of trouble: Steven Joel Kerzner.

But does not matter how much Steven has helped her, saying you have a husband is a boner killer to her desperate male fans. Look,

husband facebook

Granted, maybe after she friends someone back on FB the relationship status with her husband may be displayed. Or perhaps not. Of course this only makes LianaK look disloyal and ungrateful to her Jewish benefactor but it is just a coincidence. Hiding her marital status is all about marketing and getting her Patreon as fat as herself.

Here’s another interesting little set of “coincidences” I found while researching their public online profiles. When comparing both of their public Linkedin profiles it became painfully clear the LianaK parasite had ZERO career development before meeting her Host/Jewish benefactor: Steven Joel Kerzner.

But that does not stop there, their linkedin profiles are full of blatant nepotism. Look at Steven’s job history. He once worked 14 years straight for the same company but ever since LianaK the parasite attached herself to his life? Steven does not have a stable employer. His parasitical wife is the most likely the reason Steven does not last more than an average of 10 months at each company. Why? Because Steven has the bad habit of bringing along his favorite cancerous parasitical wife: Liana K.

Wherever she goes, everything gets poisoned and he eventually gets fired or contracts are awarded to someone else less conflict-prone and free of parasites like LianaK.

You gotta feel bad for the poor Jew-retard, he ran out of toes so long because he kept letting her shoot him in the foot at work over and over. Look:

linkedin-KOMPARE

Also notice the fact that at last century the formerly slim Liana K consistently worked in front of the camera. But as Liana kept getting older and fatter the more she has been forced to do voice work and writing. See? Aging does not forgive any of us. Liana K is so fat and old that in 2015 she barely gets any on camera job offers.

But let’s go back to the year 2007-2009 before Liana murdered so many twinkies. Here is the other main problem, look at this picture;

Liana the fraud

Liana K Parasite and host (circa 2009.) (she is much, much fatter and older now)

See that thing on the left? The one dressed up like a Looney Toon? That is neither a wife, nor an adult, much less someone reliable. It is a parasite.

See, hers was quite a fascinating costume choice: a cartoony cat-like creature that is as imaginary as a unicorn. And much like a cat, LianaK is not really a person, she is an ornamental parasitical object whose fertile clock is about to run out. The moment she cannot extract anything from her current host, the ornamental feminist parasite by the name Liana K will abandon it. (to top it off, the parasite got the costume wrong, even the left contact lense is so off, it looks like a lazy-eyed retarded thundercat)

The moment money runs out so does the “wife”. Too bad all Steven Joel Kerzner invented was a talking cum-sock. Had he invented a dog-puppet, at least he would not be left entirely alone when money runs out.

However, by the look of things what is about to run out before the money is Liana’s fertility. LianaK’s 2015-16 media shows her weight has increased considerably as well as the number of wrinkles in her face. How long before Botox or surgery? How long before cosmetic procedures stop working? How long before she is assaulted by the thoughts which will led her to finally tell herself in mid comics & fantasy convention:

“I am too old for cosplaying…”

Maybe Liana K’s deep sinking demoralizing moment will happen next convention. Maybe it already happened, or maybe it never will. Sadly, even for wilfully retarded feminist ignorance cannot always be bliss. Even for someone as willfully dishonest and ignorant as commercial feminist-SJW LianaK, no amount of cosplay make-up and accessories will remove the inescapable effects of aging that affect us all.

Sadly, that moment of sobriety where a person consciously decides to age with dignity does not happen that often with feminists like Liana K because when the bliss of ignorance is not available, emotional delusion is often chosen by the members of the religion of feminism.

Why? Well, since feminists’ emotions have a very dysfunctional marriage with the facts of human biology, they may never choose to wake up from the opium of their own feminism. That opium is between their legs.

Almost as if feminists were far more flexible than the average woman, they often chose to bury their heads within themselves for private personal and delusional amusement. Want proof? Listen to a teen feminist, they say the same illogical nonsense feminists in their 60’s say on a regular basis. When you reach your 60’s and you sound like a teenager you know you have wasted your life with feminism.

Feminism is the death of intelligence.

But since those are lies they tell themselves, I do not mind stating the obvious: Men and women have variable fertile value depending on their biological age and health. And since Liana K consistently chooses to display her partial nudity to be valued, let’s see how well she ranks when compared with women whose fertility is their main craft in life.

LIANA K’S PUBLIC FERTILE VALUE

 

narcissism (copy)
Liana K year 2007: living from past fertile glories
 
How much fertile value do female actresses have after age 40? How about strippers? How about porn stars? See, the problem with Liana is that she does not qualify for any of the above, yet she is 38 and never achieved anything in any of those 3 fields.
She has no talent as an actress and her CV shows no training as such. She has an extremely low value as a stripper because she is overweight and middle-aged. Lastly, Liana K would be painfully ignored by most respectable porn production companies because her sad, floppy, and overweight physique does not hold a candle to the many, many 20-something extremely sexual female porn stars like Kagney Linn Karter.
It is painfully obvious a hot 20-something, up-and-coming porn star would be given an interview in a snap. But Liana K? Not even a call back. Look:
Lianna vs Kagney
How about the MILF market then? Sadly, Liana K is unlikely to get much work (if any) in the 40+ category. Why? She simply does not work out beyond irregular soft-core yoga and is unlikely to be sexually experienced enough to compete with professional MILFs like Brandi Love. Despite the fact Ms Love happens to be 4 years older than Liana K, she is several orders of magnitude more athletic, fuckable, sexually experienced and attractive which make her fully employable for the next ~5-7 years. But Lianna? She is not even employable now even though she is 4 years  younger. It is appalling to see how badly Liana K is defeated by even someone older than herself. Behold,
 weight gain (copy)
 Well, how about number of followers? Maybe Liana K could hold a candle against Brandi Lov…
Oh…nevermind…
 screenshot386

LIANA K’S INTELLECTUAL VALUE

Hoff

Granted, Liana K is too old and overweight to compete physically with professionals of the adult entertainment industry, thus, it would make more sense she abstained from displaying the nudity she mistakenly believes has any marketable value. If Liana K is oblivious to aging with dignity, at least she can prevent herself from doing so publicly. Her nudity is something to pity, not to behold.
But how about her intellectual value. Perhaps Liana K has skills that could make up for her dwindling fertility? Well let’s put it this way; Let’s say you are a recruiter for a University and two candidates apply for the same liberal arts position:
Candidate 1: Commercial feminist & SJW Liana K
Who would you give the job to? Who would have the highest chances for a teaching position? See, leaving salary variables aside, most likely professor Sommers would stand a much better chance than Liana K, simply because she is far smarter has the experience and the CV to do so.
But it gets worse, what if you asked Liana what her job title is?
In her own barfed words this is what she does for a living:
I always have trouble describing my job title. Essentially, I’m a videogame philosopher, but that sounds flaky, so I’m called a “games journalist” most of the time. Having come from a news and entertainment background, I think it’s almost impossible to do by-the-book games journalism these days, so I’m growing increasingly uncomfortable with that title. I do articles. I do videos. I try to do right by gamers. That’s what I do.
Yes, Liana K definitely struggles to articulate what she does for a living. Why? Because it would too much to ask her to be honest and instead say this:
“I never learned a craft and all I do is a bullshit feminist job.”

No. Feminism is not a job qualification, it is a dogmatic obstacle for learning.

But the inconvenient truth with feminists like Liana K is that they grow up with a princess complex, full of entitlement and narcissism. So much so that from a very early age they become addicted to their youth and narcissistic need for attention. They often forgo learning any real skills and instead, they limit themselves to their religion: feminism. Then they eventually hit 40 then become useless and depressed without their looks. Why? Because they never learned anything else besides being “pretty-dumb”. Feminists would like to see themselves as beautiful ageless unicorns but the reality is far from elegant: they are obsolete, 40-something narcissistic one-trick feminist donkeys.
This nearly obsolete one-trick feminist donkey nature applies to LiannaK because she is almost 40 and has no real-world skills or academic training to speak of other than being “pretty-dumb”.
But for a woman who has had a steady income provided by her husband’s family, you would have expected her to have gone to school in the last 20 years.
But no. All she achieved was a mediocre degree in English at York University.

That is it.

No. It is not a satire or a joke. Liana K never tried in 20 years to go back to school or at least she “forgot” to add that key piece of information on her Linkedin CV. Of course, if she ever claimed other “hidden” degrees, it would be best to verify if she was lying once again. Wouldn’t it?
But no, by Occam’s Razor, the simplest explanation is that, just like Anita Sarkeesian, Liana lacks the intelligence and drive to achieve anything on her own. Liana K’s Jonathan McIntosh is her husband, the Jew-retard Steven Joel Kerzner. Without him? Liana K is reduced to what Liana the white trash queen really is: A talentless middle-aged ex-stripper with narcissistic dreams of grandeur.

LIANNAK MINUS HER LIES

Empowered GRANNY LIANA!
So what do we have if we remove all of Liana’s lies? What would be left if we remove all of Liana K’s hypocritical virtue signaling for brownie points? What if we removed her desperate need to display her saggy and aging nudity? What if we also removed the fake Jewish last name, also her useless humanities degree? And finally, what if we removed her fake “discriminated and oppressed Jewishness” claims?
All that would be left is a broken pathological liar, a middle-aged feminist cosplayer with a Peter Pan complex who desperately tries to broadcast herself as more than what she is: Liana K is glorified Canadian white trash. Nothing more.

Worst thing is, Liana K is publicly  aging without dignity. Even if we let her try to cosplay her aging & overweight biological reality away, such a desperate task would only be a failure, just like her life. Ex-stripper or not, Liana K is a talentless feminist parasite.

Despite all this, try to be nice to her on Twitter.
After all, If you lacked integrity & intelligence like @redlianak, you’d also rely on desperate displays of saggy nudity for money at her ripe age of 38. 
Have pity on Liana K, all of her income will stop at 40.

PS

Oh wait! They only have cats! Maybe there is hope for the Jews and LianaK truly became barren with her two abortions!

Maybe that is why all LianaK can achieve is just 4-5 Cats and 2 dogs but zero real human children.

Most likely Lianna also “speaks feline” to her fucking subset of a child: Her dumb & fat cat “Momo”.

Another barren & old crazy cat lady in the making…

Thank you for reading.

*NOTE BY The Ralph: Oh, and check out the Shoot Stream from Friday. It’s now the biggest one ever!