Meet the Feminist Behind Youtube’s Censorship: Susan “icky” Wojcicki (Part 1 of 2)

DISCLAIMER 1: What follows is a mixture of facts, speculation & satire therefore the adverb “allegedly” prefaces and applies to the whole article.

DISCLAIMER 2: I am a proud Neo-Troll & I DO NOT represent anybody but myself. Truth with zero protocol will be used; get offended. Feel free to disregard everything I say based on my Troll status.

For those who stayed, read on;

(EDITOR’S NOTE: Feel free to checkout Jack’s site)

PART 1 OF 2

(PART OF A TRR SERIES ON) 

series-on-feminism2

1

MEET THE FEMINIST BEHIND YOUTUBE’S CENSORSHIP: SUSAN “ICKY” WOJCICKI

The purpose of a religion is to infect a community.

First, a religion embraces the group, then it extends and metastasizes within it in order to exterminate anything that it finds “offensive”.

Religions use the ancient “Embrace, Extend & Exterminate” approach.

Unfortunately, both the Google corporation and the YouTube community have already embraced a religion that also aims to extend itself and exterminate anything that it finds “offensive”.

That religion infecting YouTube is called feminism and it has a leader:

YouTube’s current feminist CEO, Susan Wojcicki.

WELCOME TO THE NEW HELL-BENT ON FEMINISM YOUTUBE

In February 2014, almost inexplicably, a mediocre, uglier than a horse feminist with a worthless humanities degree became YouTube’s CEO:

Susan “Icky” Wojcicki

Then things started to change in YouTube for the worse.

As of August 2016, YouTube had drastically changed its guidelines. They’ve consistently been demonetizing videos that are arbitrarily deemed “offensive”. This effectively has censored hundreds of prominent YouTubers by taking away their income simply because they did not agree with the “popular” feminist opinion.

Then YouTube started recruiting “YouTube heroes” or, in other words, hordes of SJWs ready to mass-flag anything that would match their new feminist guidelines.

The reality is that “Demonetizing” is a short, euphemistic way of saying:

“If you offend feminism, we won’t pay you, no matter how hard you work or how many people like you”.

1-5

A prime example of this censorship by “demonetization” was a YouTuber with “only” 4 million subscribers: Philip DeFranco

YouTube’s initial response to the uproar?

Among others, they managed to directly respond to a certain Patricia Hernandez  (rape-obsessed Radfem) who works for an “insignificant” corrupt website called Kotaku.

YouTube followed their tepid response to the uproar with this incredibly dishonest video:

You can see the video above has regressive progressive undertones smeared all over it: it features politically correct minorities (a gay feminist man and an innocent-looking female feminist) using “proper language”.  Which falsely represents the thousands of male engineers building YouTube every day.

The result to the above travesty?

DeFranco did not buy their lies nor did the audience.

Look at the staggering number of dislikes. It almost looks as bad as a feminist-Ghostbuster-trailer-train-wreck:
1-7

Despite the many efforts to downplay the backlash, people still rejected their lies.

But allow me to rub some salt and add a little color to the bland, grey and politically correct dislike ratio on their video. Allow me to just highlight how much universally panned their false explanation was.

Behold the beautiful honesty of 84k red dislikes:

1-6

Firstly, a few relevant things about the video:

It is full of jump-cuts. The explanation for the heavy editing of a meager 3-minute video is that either they are retards in front of a camera (despite the fact they work for a video company) or it was heavily scripted.

My money is on the latter.

Secondly, we have a feminist by the name Zindzi McCormick who holds a humanities degree from one of the hardest-leftists schools in the US: Brown University.

Yes, the same Brown university with actual safe spaces featuring cookies, coloring books, Play-Doh, blankets and photos of puppies for its triggered “adult” students.

These details may seem trivial but critical decisions such as drastically changing guidelines, responding directly to redfems at Kotaku, placing leftists without STEM training in positions of power, making them appear on heavily scripted videos and YouTube’s management outright ignoring the audience’s backlash are not “coincidences”.

Not at all.

Those events are part of a cancerous trend coming from YouTube’s main feminist source: YouTube’s CEO Susan “Icky” Wojcicki.

Point in case, look at the sheer number of dislikes and just put two and two together. The audience is clearly not buying their lies YET YouTube’s management is hell-bent on enforcing them. What would be the reason?

Exactly. Narrative over facts.

If your audience is unanimously against your new rules, wouldn’t it be in your best interest to change them?

One would think so. But YouTube management won’t be looking at facts objectively anytime soon.

At least not as long as there is a feminist narrative to obey and Susan “Icky” Wojcicki is the one hell-bent on enforcing them even if it means burning YouTube to the ground (just like Ellen Pao did with Reddit: she wanted it to be hers or to have it burned to the ground).

At least, that is what corporate feminists do. They #BurnItForEquality and Susan “Icky” Wojcicki is one of them.

3-consistent

 THE WOJCICKI NARCISSIST

Susan “Icky” Wojcicki’s narcissistic motivations became crystal clear in 2015. She attended a “little” feminist conference called “Grace Hopper Women in Computer Celebration 2015”, when she was still fresh from her YouTube CEO promotion.

When addressing the audience, out of all the fascinating engineering feats that influence YouTube massive viewership, out of all the technologies developed by Google, she chose to open with this (skip to minute 6):

“Let me start with a story of my own life…”

TRANSLATION:
“let me talk about myself with little girls as an excuse.”

3-5-censored

This strategy Wojcicki used was reminiscent of another radfem by the name Adria Richards who used the same “what about the girls!?” moral panic tactic to broadcast her narcissism (along with her Joan of Arc delusions) to get two innocent men ejected from a conference just because she heard a joke unrelated to her. Then she proceeded to publicly boast about it.

Feast your eyes:

adria

Adria’s dishonest actions escalated incredibly fast, to the point of one of the men getting fired, the Anonymous swarm getting involved until the toxic bitch got fired. It was so chaotic that the whole drama event became known as #DongleGate and was preserved on the dankness of Encyclopedia Dramatica.

Just like Adria’s, Susan’s narcissism was not subtle at all, it was a vulgar act of self-promotion through a perfunctory and apocryphal “heart-warming” anecdote.

But since we all know personal stories get old pretty fast, Susan had to take her feminist narcissism to the next level.

See, when a radfem says that:

“Girls are discriminated in STEM fields!”

They are not really talking about the “girls”, they are talking about themselves and how they remember their own inferiority complex while growing up. They do not care about present day “girls”, they only use them as an excuse to talk about themselves.

By the same token, Susan “Icky” Wojcicki was not really talking about her daughter, she was publicly engorging her narcissism by using her own child as an excuse, as a mere shield.

Then she went on to saying that her actions and decisions are instead motivated by her “altruistic” need to help little girls like her daughter, who could not even use the computer at home because her evil brother had “conquered it”.

Right…because according to feminism, her son has to be “evil” and her daughter is the default “victim”.

Men are default abusers, her infant son included.

(plus Wojcicki is rich enough to buy at least 10 computers to each of her children)

That is how low feminists go. They use their OWN children as an excuse to peddle their feminist religion.

And despite all these lies, nobody called her out.

Unbelievable.

youtube-heroes

SUSAN WOJCICKI: THE MEDIOCRE MOTHER AND HER “HEROES”

See, here is the other problem with wealthy feminists in the tech industry such as Susan “Icky” Wojcicki:

They want to have it all without sacrifice.

Wojcicki is so deeply invested in the feminist narrative of “having it all”  that she publicly claims to make a daily effort to be home every day at 6 PM to have dinner with her 5 children, (yes, she cynically took maternity leave 5 times in the last 17 years) in her own words:

“I try, because I found that if I’m home for dinner, I can get the scoop from my kids on the day.
After my kids go to bed, I check email. It’s about having that balance,”

“Balance”?

Here is the inconvenient truth: 

Susan “Icky” Wojcicki is a failed part-time mother at best and her children have been raised by highly paid strangers.

There is no “balance” in her life. 

“Getting the scoop” means she is a mediocre mother and only gets a mere fraction of her children’s lives.

Feminists like Susan Wojcicki, are faithfully invested in a feminist religion of ideals while they turn a blind eye to the glaring facts of their reality: Their children are not truly theirs, they are flesh and bone trophies raised by strangers and offered to the religion of feminism.

That is the saddest part: Children tend to pay the price of a greedy feminist mother who wants to have it all. Those children usually grow up wealthy yet neglected.

Women cannot “have it all”, men can’t either.

Nobody can, because being “Jack of trades, master of none” also applies to parenting.

Furthermore, despite Wojcicki’s net worth of at least $350 million, (versus Sergey Brin’s 38.2 billion, which proves how much of a talentless parasite she is) she is painfully aware how much of a mediocre mother she is.

She knows she missed meaningful, invaluable parts of her children’s lives all because of her obsession with work.

Imagine you are a wealthy dysfunctional mother with a misplaced sense of purpose who has been brainwashed by her university and social group.

How would you deal with your mediocre mother guilt?

Exactly.

By overcompensating vicariously.

In other words, Wojcicki’s brand of corporate predatory altruism where she recruits “YouTube Heroes” to mass-flag content is just a desperate attempt to make up for her mediocre role as a mother.

In a nutshell, this Icky-Wojcicki witch is censoring YouTube to overcompensate for her own guilt.

Furthermore, despite their name, YouTube Heroes are not “heroes”, they are a mere glorified online lynching mob using “reporting forms” instead of pitchforks and nooses empowered by a failed rich mother with a misplaced sense of guilt.

It is just fascinatingly retarded how a mediocre feminist mother such as Susan “Icky” Wojcicki can use her job to try to convince herself she did not fail at motherhood.

What a double-espresso feminist retard.

The fact that radfems like Adria Richards and Icky Wojcicki are moved by a deep need to regulate, censor and suppress male behavior and any non-leftist ideas because “men are evil and women are good” should have prevented them from working in the tech industry. Instead, the opposite happened.

Both Adria Richards and Susan Wojcicki were given power by virtue of being women not by earning it. And nobody in those conferences called them out on it.

Why? Simple. Silicon Valley AND Google itself lean hard to the left which explains why tech conferences often are such blatant feminist snake pits.


This is the end of part 1 of 2.

On part 2 we will finally see how Susan “Icky” Wojcicki managed to snatch the YouTube CEO position and her many connections in Google. Stay tuned.

Thank you for reading.

Advertisements

One thought on “Meet the Feminist Behind Youtube’s Censorship: Susan “icky” Wojcicki (Part 1 of 2)

  1. […] you may remember, on part 1, we saw how YouTube has been enforcing their SJW-based censorship on videos that do not conform to […]

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: